Indices of exercise induced muscle damage following low load resistance exercise with blood flow restriction in untrained males

No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Proppe, Christopher E.
Rivera, P. M.
Gonzalez-Rojas, D. H.
Lawson, J. E.
Kelly, R.
Rotenberger, N.
Salazar, S., S.
Hill, E. C.
Advisors
Issue Date
2024-09
Type
Article
Keywords
Muscle damage , Low load resistance exercise , Blood flow restriction
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Citation
Proppe, C. E., Rivera, P. M., Kelly, R. T., Rotenberger, N. P., Salazar, S., Lubiak, S. M., & Hill, E. C. (2024). Indices of exercise induced muscle damage following low load resistance exercise with blood flow restriction in untrained males. The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 64(9), 880–888. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.24.15896-3
Abstract

Background: There is conflicting evidence regarding the presence and magnitude of exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) following low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction (LL+BFR), which may be related to the protocol implemented or exercise volume. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to examine the effects of a 75 repetition (BFR-75) (1×30, 3×15) and four sets to volitional failure (BFR-4x) protocols on indices of EIMD among untrained men.

Methods: Twelve males with no history of lower-body resistance training during the previous six months volunteered for this investigation. One leg was randomly assigned to BFR-75, and the other to BFR-4x. Participants performed isokinetic, unilateral, concentric-eccentric, leg extension muscle actions at 30% of maximal strength with BFR. Indices of EIMD (limb circumference, perceived muscle soreness, pain pressure threshold [PPT], passive range of motion, and maximal strength [MVIC]) were recorded before exercise and 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96-hours post-exercise for each protocol.

Results: There were no significant changes (P>0.05) in limb circumference, PPT, passive range of motion, or MVIC. For both BFR-75 and BFR-4x, perceived muscle soreness increased (P<0.001) similarly 24- (2.5±1.7 AU) and 48-hours (1.9±1.7 AU) post-exercise.

Conclusions: There was an increase in muscle soreness 24-48 hours post-exercise for both conditions, which may be due to metabolic stress, but this did not affect the force-generating capacity of the muscle (MVIC), suggesting minimal EIMD. The conflicting evidence of EIMD following LL+BFR may be related to differences in restriction time or overall exercise time.

Table of Contents
Description
Publisher
Edizoni Minverva Medica
Journal
The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness
Book Title
Series
PubMed ID
ISSN
0022-4707
1827-1928
EISSN