Detention for probation violators: characteristics of youth locked up for violating probation

dc.contributor.advisorCraig-Moreland, Delores E.
dc.contributor.authorHarms, Randi Jay
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-28T22:56:06Z
dc.date.available2012-11-28T22:56:06Z
dc.date.copyright2012en
dc.date.issued2012-05
dc.descriptionThesis (M.A.)--Wichita State University, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Dept. of Criminal Justiceen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study examined the population of juvenile offenders admitted to a juvenile detention facility in one county in Kansas for a probation violation between July 1, 2010 and December 31, 2010. This descriptive study was exploratory in nature and identified characteristics of this population including demographics, risk of reoffending, case information, and outcomes. A total of 147 admissions were included in this study, involving 109 different youth, some of whom violated standard probation, and some of whom violated intensive supervision probation. This study also looked at the role of zero-tolerance language in sentencing orders and its role in the use of detention as a sanction for probation violations. For the majority of probation violation related detention admissions, the most serious offense in the case was a misdemeanor (71% of admissions) and a minor crime (65% of admissions). Nearly 50% of the admissions in this study were related to a single probation violation, and only 17% were related to an arrest or new charge. Of the 122 admissions for technical probation violations, 49% were related to a violation of zero-tolerance language in a sentencing order. Most of the admissions in this study resulted in a stay in detention that was less than one week, with 45% of admissions resulting in less than three days in detention. The vast majority (71%) of admissions for zero tolerance violations resulted in less than three days in detention. The results of this study indicate that nonviolent youth who have not committed serious crimes are serving time in detention due to technical probation violations. Additionally, zero tolerance language, particularly zero tolerance regarding school attendance, is related to multiple short stays in detention.en_US
dc.format.extentx, 74 p.en
dc.identifier.othert12017
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/5392
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWichita State Universityen_US
dc.rightsCopyright Randi Jay Harms, 2012. All rights reserveden
dc.subject.lcshElectronic dissertationsen
dc.titleDetention for probation violators: characteristics of youth locked up for violating probationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
t12017_Harms.pdf
Size:
716.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: