Loading...
Signal detection evidence for limited capacity in visual search
Palmer, Evan M. ; Fencsik, David E. ; Flusberg, Stephen J. ; Horowitz, Todd S. ; Wolfe, Jeremy M.
Palmer, Evan M.
Fencsik, David E.
Flusberg, Stephen J.
Horowitz, Todd S.
Wolfe, Jeremy M.
Citations
Altmetric:
Other Names
Location
Time Period
Advisors
Original Date
Digitization Date
Issue Date
2011-01-01
Type
Article
Genre
Keywords
Theoretical and computational attention models,Visual search,Signal detection theory
Subjects (LCSH)
Citation
Palmer E.M., Fencsik D.E., Flusberg S.J., Horowitz T.S., and Wolfe J.M. 2011. "Signal detection evidence for limited capacity in visual search". Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics. 73 (8): 2413-2424.
Abstract
The nature of capacity limits (if any) in visual search has been a topic of controversy for decades. In 30 years of work, researchers have attempted to distinguish between two broad classes of visual search models. Attention-limited models have proposed two stages of perceptual processing: an unlimited-capacity preattentive stage, and a limited-capacity selective attention stage. Conversely, noise-limited models have proposed a single, unlimited-capacity perceptual processing stage, with decision processes influenced only by stochastic noise. Here, we use signal detection methods to test a strong prediction of attention-limited models. In standard attention-limited models, performance of some searches (feature searches) should only be limited by a preattentive stage. Other search tasks (e.g., spatial configuration search for a "2" among "5"s) should be additionally limited by an attentional bottleneck. We equated average accuracies for a feature and a spatial configuration s! earch over set sizes of 1-8 for briefly presented stimuli. The strong prediction of attention-limited models is that, given overall equivalence in performance, accuracy should be better on the spatial configuration search than on the feature search for set size 1, and worse for set size 8. We confirm this crossover interaction and show that it is problematic for at least one class of one-stage decision models.
Table of Contents
Description
Click on the DOI link below to access the article(may not be free).
Publisher
Springer
Journal
Book Title
Series
Attention, Perception and Psychophysics;2011 :, v.73, no.8
Digital Collection
Finding Aid URL
Use and Reproduction
Archival Collection
PubMed ID
DOI
ISSN
1943-3921
1943-393X
1943-393X
