Testing the threat-sensitive hypothesis with predator familiarity and dietary specificity
Crawford, B.A. Hickman, C.R. Luhring, Thomas M.
Crawford, B.A.
Hickman, C.R.
Luhring, Thomas M.
Citations
Altmetric:
Other Names
Location
Time Period
Advisors
Original Date
Digitization Date
Issue Date
2011-11-14
Type
Article
Genre
Keywords
Subjects (LCSH)
Citation
Abstract
In a system with multiple predators, the threat-sensitive predator avoidance hypothesis predicts that prey respond differently to predators relative to the risks each poses (e.g., degree of dietary specialization). Aquatic animals often rely heavily on detecting predators via chemical cues (kairomones) and respond with a suite of behaviors including detection and avoidance. However, little is known about how animals respond to kairomones of specialist versus generalist predators. In laboratory experiments, we compared behavioral responses of a poorly studied aquatic salamander, the greater siren (Siren lacertina), to cues from specialist and generalist predator snakes to evaluate threat-sensitive responses. Sirens exhibited a novel behavior (gill-flushing) most often in the presence of specialist predator cues. Avoidance behavior (reversing direction following cue detection) was higher in response to specialist predator and novel animal control cues and lowest in response to generalist predator cues. An intermediate response to the animal control, an unfamiliar amphibian predator, indicated that sirens respond cautiously to a novel cue. The gradient of observed responses to different snake cues indicates that sirens may be evaluating predation potential of animals based on their foraging specificity and familiarity. © 2011 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.
Table of Contents
Description
Publisher
Journal
Ethology
Book Title
Series
Digital Collection
Finding Aid URL
Use and Reproduction
Archival Collection
PubMed ID
ISSN
14390310