Criticism is not a four-letter word: Best practices for constructive feedback in the peer review of teaching

No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Alabi, Jaena
Weare, William H., Jr.
Advisors
Issue Date
2012-05-03
Type
Conference paper
Preprint
Keywords
Peer review of teaching , Feedback , Peer coaching , Library instruction , Criticism
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Citation
Alabi, J., & Weare, W. H., Jr. (2014). Criticism is not a four-letter word: Best practices for constructive feedback in the peer review of teaching. In B. Seitz, R. Baier, S. deVries, S. Fabian, S. Memmott, & R. Stevens (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fortieth National LOEX Library Instruction Conference, 141-145. Ypsilanti, MI: LOEX Press
Abstract

In recent years, peer review of teaching (PROT) has become an increasingly important tool for evaluating library instruction. Most PROT programs consist of three components: a pre-observation meeting, the observation of teaching, and a post-observation session. The post-observation feedback session can be especially challenging—for both the observer and the observed. Drawing upon literature addressing the peer review of teaching, the authors recommend a set of best practices for providing constructive criticism to fellow instruction librarians.

Table of Contents
Description
Preprint of this article is available in SOAR for view / download
Publisher
LOEX Press
Journal
Book Title
Series
Fortieth National LOEX Library Instruction Conference Proceedings, Columbus, Ohio, May 3-5, 2012
LOEX Conference Proceedings
2012
PubMed ID
DOI
ISSN
EISSN