Alternative reporting options across the United States: Documenting each state’s options for sexual assault kit collection without a police report

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Authors
Goodman-Williams, Rachael
Hanna, A.
Henley, K.
Abernathy, Danette
Advisors
Issue Date
2025-03-10
Type
Article
Keywords
Alternative reporting options , Medical forensic exam , Police reporting , Rape , Sexual assault , Sexual assault kit , Violence Against Women Act
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Citation
Goodman-Williams, R., Hanna, A., Henley, K. et al. Alternative Reporting Options Across the United States: Documenting Each State’s Options for Sexual Assault Kit Collection Without a Police Report. Sex Res Soc Policy (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-025-01102-x
Abstract

Introduction: The Violence Against Women Act requires that sexual assault victims be able to have a sexual assault kit (SAK) collected without reporting the assault to police, but the details of this “non-report SAK” option vary from state to state. The goal of this study was to analyze non-report SAK policies across the United States. Methods: Information about each state’s policy was collected from 80 practitioners from January 2024 to June 2024. A descriptive policy analysis was conducted, with specific focus on each state’s available options, age of access, forensic testing policies, storage location and timeframe, availability of free medical only exams, and crime victim’s compensation eligibility. Results: All but one state has a formalized non-report SAK option, with six states offering multiple options. Eleven states grant minors access to these options in at least some circumstances. Four states require and five states provide optional forensic testing for non-report SAKs. Law enforcement agencies were the most common storage location, with storage timelines ranging from 90 days to 75 years (M = 17.01 years, SD = 19.05 years). Twenty states offer a free medical exam without forensic evidence collection and 22 have extended victim’s compensation fund eligibility to victims who have a non-report SAK collected. Conclusions: Non-report SAK policies vary widely across the United States, with victims in some states having many more options than in others. Policy Implications: Policymakers should consider expanding the options available to non-reporting victims in states with few options available. Failing to offer free medical only exams, in particular, may have downstream consequences for victims and help-seeking systems. © The Author(s) 2025.

Table of Contents
Description
This is an open access article under the CC BY license.
Publisher
Springer
Journal
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
Book Title
Series
PubMed ID
ISSN
18689884
EISSN