Sympathy or shock: How transgression diagnosticity impacts consumer perceptions and intentions regarding person-brands

dc.contributor.authorMatthews, A. Lynn
dc.contributor.authorLuebke, Sarah S.F.
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-07T21:08:24Z
dc.date.available2023-11-07T21:08:24Z
dc.date.issued2023-10
dc.descriptionClick on the DOI link to access this article (may not be free).
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Moral transgressions committed by person-brands can negatively impact consumers through the transgression's diagnosticity (severity, centrality and consistency). This paper aims to test how a transgression's centrality and consistency impact important consumer perceptions and behavioral intentions toward a person-brand, holding constant the transgression in question. These outcomes are crucial for person-brands to understand how to minimize and manage the impact of a given transgression. Design/methodology/approach: This paper uses three online consumer experiments to manipulate transgression diagnosticity via centrality and consistency and identifies the resulting impact on consumer-brand identification, trustworthiness and consumer digital engagement intentions through PROCESS models. Findings: High-diagnosticity transgressions lower consumer digital engagement intentions regarding the person-brand and their endorsed products. This effect is serially mediated by consumer-brand identification, as predicted by social identity theory, and by perceived trustworthiness of the person-brand. Practical implications: Person-brands should emphasize the nondiagnostic nature of any transgressions in which they are involved, including a lack of centrality and consistency with their brand, and guard against the appearance of diagnostic transgressions. Originality/value: This paper shows that transgression diagnosticity impacts consumer engagement through the pathway of consumer-brand identification and trustworthiness. It also manipulates aspects of diagnosticity that can be influenced by the person-brand (centrality and consistency) while holding the transgression constant. As such, this paper extends the literature on transgressions, on person-branding strategy, and on social identity theory.
dc.identifier.citationMatthews, A.L. and Luebke, S.S.F. (2023), "Sympathy or shock: how transgression diagnosticity impacts consumer perceptions and intentions regarding person-brands", Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-10-2022-4179.
dc.identifier.issn1061-0421
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-10-2022-4179
dc.identifier.urihttps://soar.wichita.edu/handle/10057/25995
dc.language.isoen-US
dc.publisherEmerald Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Product and Brand Management
dc.rights.holder© Copyright 2023 Emerald Publishing Limited
dc.subjectBrand identification
dc.subjectDiagnosticity
dc.subjectExperimental design
dc.subjectPersonal branding
dc.subjectSocial identity theory
dc.subjectTransgression
dc.titleSympathy or shock: How transgression diagnosticity impacts consumer perceptions and intentions regarding person-brands
dc.typeArticle
Files