Comparing predictable and unpredictable instability in dual-task balance training

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Issue Date
2016-04-29
Authors
Anderson, Cathy
Advisor
Patterson, Jeremy A.
Citation

Anderson, Cathy. 2016. Comparing predictable and unpredictable instability in dual-task balance training. --In Proceedings: 12th Annual Symposium on Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects. Wichita, KS: Wichita State University, p. 17

Abstract

Balance training (BT) is a vital component of many exercise programs, but actual prescriptions for exercise frequency, intensity, time and type have yet to be defined. This study compared one BT session on two balance platforms: a predictably unstable tilt board (roll movement), and an unpredictably unstable shake board (roll, pitch, and yaw movements), to see if a relationship exists between the type of platform used and measurable balance improvement. A concurrent task was added to increase cognitive complexity. Methods: Twenty healthy young adults were randomly assigned to stand on the tilt board or the shake board while performing Bal-A-Vis-X ball-bouncing exercises. Each subjects balance (overall stability, anteroposterior stability, mediolateral stability) was measured before and after BT using a Biodex Balance System SD. Results: On average, each platform group showed balance improvement. The evidence failed to support the hypothesis of a significant or meaningful difference between the platforms.

Table of Content
Description
Presented to the 12th Annual Symposium on Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects (GRASP) held at the Heskett Center, Wichita State University, April 29, 2016.
Research completed at Department of Human Performance Studies, College of Education
publication.page.dc.relation.uri