Can the efficacy of electrically stimulated pedaling using a commercially available ergometer BE improved by minimizing the muscle stress–time integral?

No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Hakansson, Nils A.
Hull, Maury L.
Advisors
Issue Date
2011-09-21
Type
Article
Keywords
Electrical stimulation , Energy , FES , Muscle , Pedaling , Recumbent , Rehabilitation , Simulation
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Citation
Hakansson, N.A. and Hull, M.L. (2012), Can the efficacy of electrically stimulated pedaling using a commercially available ergometer BE improved by minimizing the muscle stress–time integral?. Muscle & Nerve, 45: 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.22302
Abstract

Introduction: The cardiorespiratory and muscular strength benefits of functional electrical stimulation (FES) pedaling for spinal cord injury (SCI) subjects are limited because the endurance of electrically stimulated muscle is low. Methods: We tested new electrical stimulation timing patterns (Stim3, designed using a forward dynamic simulation to minimize the muscle stress–time integral) to determine whether SCI subjects could increase work and metabolic responses when pedaling a commercial FES ergometer. Work, rate of oxygen uptake (V̇O2), and blood lactate data were taken from 11 subjects (injury level T4–T12) on repeated trials. Results: Subjects performed 11% more work pedaling with Stim3 than with existing stimulation patterns (StimErg) (P = 0.043). Average (V̇O2) and blood lactate concentrations were not significantly different between Stim3 (442 ml/min, 5.9 mmol/L) and StimErg (417 ml/min, 5.9 mmol/L). Conclusion: The increased mechanical work performed with Stim3 supports the use of patterns that minimize the muscle stress–time integral to prolong FES pedaling.

Table of Contents
Description
Article published: 2011-09-21. Issue published: 2012-03.
Publisher
Wiley Periodicals
Journal
Muscle & Nerve
Book Title
Series
PubMed ID
ISSN
0148-639X
1097-4598
EISSN