Revisiting two thiophosphate compounds constituting d(_0) transition metal HfP(_2)S(6) and d({10}) transition metal α-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6) as multifunctional materials for combining second harmonic generation response and photocurrent response

No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Cropek, Craig M.
Ji, Bingheng
Sarkar, Arka
Wang, Fei
Syed, Tajamul Hussain
Wei, Wei
Guo, Sheng-Ping
Wang, Jian
Advisors
Issue Date
2023-01-18
Type
Article
Keywords
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Citation
Cropek, C., Ji, B., Sarkar, A., Wang, F., Syed, T. H., Wei, W., . . . Wang, J. (2023). Revisiting two thiophosphate compounds constituting d\(_0\) transition metal HfP\(_2\)S\(_6\) and d\(_{10}\) transition metal ?-Ag4P2S6 as multifunctional materials for combining second harmonic generation response and photocurrent response [10.1039/D2CE01576E]. CrystEngComm, 25(7), 1175-1185. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2CE01576E
Abstract

Two acentric thiophosphate compounds, HfP(_2)S(_6) and α-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6), are revisited and studied as infrared nonlinear optical materials. HfP(_2)S(_6) and α-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6) were structurally characterized without any property measurements. In this work, HfP(_2)S(_6) and α-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6) were synthesized via high temperature salt flux reactions. Low-temperature polymorph acentric α-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6) was purified and grown as mm-sized crystals with the aid of AgBr flux. The AgBr flux was revealed to play an important role in stabilizing the acentric α-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6). The acentric α-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6) transforms to centrosymmetric β-Ag4P2S6 at 850(5) K, which is revealed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis and powder X-ray diffraction experiments. HfP(_2)S(_6) and α-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6) are discovered by UV-vis spectrum measurements as indirect bandgap semiconductors with bandgaps of 2.2(1) eV and 2.5(1) eV, respectively, which is supported by DFT calculations and TB-LMTO-ASA calculations. The bonding pictures of α-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6) were studied by crystal orbital Hamilton population calculations (COHP) coupled with electron localization function (ELF) analysis. DFT calculations predict that HfP(_2)S(_6) and α-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6) would exhibit different optical performances regardless of being constructed from identical [P(_2)S(_6)] motifs. HfP(_2)S(_6) exhibits a low second harmonic generation (SHG) response, ∼0.21 × AGS (for the sample of particle size of 25 μm). α-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6) possesses moderate SHG response, ∼0.61 × AGS (for the sample of particle size of 225 μm) coupled with a high laser damage threshold (LDT) of ∼3.2 × AGS. Characteristics of high ambient stability, moderate bandgap and SHG response, type-I phase-matching capability, and high LDT together with the easy growth of large crystals make α-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6) attractive for future infrared nonlinear optical applications. Photocurrent measurements found that α-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6) and β-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6) have high photocurrent response, 165 nA cm−2 and 135 nA cm−2, respectively. α-Ag(_4)P(_2)S(_6) is a new multifunctional material of the ternary Ag–P–S system, which combines nonlinear optical (NLO) properties and photocurrent response.

Table of Contents
Description
Click on the DOI to access this article (may not be free).
Publisher
The Royal Society of Chemistry
Journal
Book Title
Series
CrystEngComm
Volume 25, No. 7
PubMed ID
DOI
ISSN
1466-8033
EISSN