The effect of illumination on the visibility of steps and ramps for people with low vision

No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Lei, Quan
Gage, Rachel
Kersten, Daniel
Legge, Gordon E.
Advisors
Issue Date
2024
Type
Article
Keywords
Hazards , Percent reductions , Alternative forced choice , Contrast sensitivity , Design parameters , Illumination levels , Indoor space , Low vision , Poor visibility , Subject recognition , Three-level , Visibility , Adult , Aged , Comparative study , Contrast sensitivity , Female , Human , Illumination , Low vision , Male , Middle aged , Pathophysiology , Physiology , Visual acuity , Adult , Aged , Contrast Sensitivity , Female , Humans , Lighting , Male , Middle Aged , Vision , Low , Visual Acuity
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Citation
Lei, Q., Gage, R., Kersten, D., Legge, G.E. The effect of illumination on the visibility of steps and ramps for people with low vision. (2024). Optometry and Vision Science, 101 (6), pp. 399-407. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002146
Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE: Poor visibility of indoor features such as steps and ramps can pose mobility hazards for people with low vision. For purposes of architectural design, it is important to understand how design parameters such as the illumination level of an indoor space affect the visibility of steps and ramps. PURPOSE: This study was aimed to examine the effect of typical variation in photopic illumination level in an indoor space on the visibility of steps and ramps for individuals with low vision. METHODS: Steps and ramps were constructed in a large windowless room illuminated by overhead lights. Subjects with low vision completed a 5-alternative forced choice task to recognize the targets at three levels of photopic illumination, i.e., 800, 80, and 8 lux, and gave confidence ratings about their judgments on a 5-point scale. Acuities and contrast sensitivities of the subjects were also measured at each illumination level. For comparison, a group of normally sighted subjects with simulated acuity reduction also completed the step-and-ramp recognition task. RESULTS: For both groups of subjects, recognition accuracy was not affected by illumination level. For subjects with low vision, however, there was a significant effect of illumination level on confidence rating: subjects became more confident about their judgments with increasing illumination. There was also a weak effect of illumination level on acuity and contrast sensitivity, both worsening with decreasing illumination. Recognition performance was best predicted by contrast sensitivity, whereas confidence was best predicted by visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Illumination variation over a typical photopic range in an indoor space had minimal effect on the objective visibility of steps and ramps for people with low vision. However, illumination level affected subjects' confidence in hazard recognition. Design decisions on parameters such as illumination should consider the consequences on both the objective and the subjective accessibility of a space. Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Optometry.

Table of Contents
Description
Publisher
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Journal
Optometry and Vision Science
Book Title
Series
PubMed ID
ISSN
1040-5488
EISSN