Strategies of North and South : a comparative analysis of the Union and Confederate campaigns

No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Earley, Gerald L.,
Advisors
Issue Date
2021
Type
History.;Military history.
Keywords
Confederate States of America;United States;Confederate States of America;United States , Generals , Generals History , Operational art (Military science) History , Strategy History , Command of troops History , Command of troops , Generals , Military campaigns , Operational art (Military science) , Strategy
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Citation
Earley, Gerald L. Strategies of North and South: A Comparative Analysis of the Union and Confederate Campaigns. McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers, 2021.
Abstract
Table of Contents
"There has been a tendency since the antebellum days to view the South as martially superior to the North. In the antebellum years Southern elites viewed themselves as cavaliers and referred to Northerners as Yankees. The object here is to investigate the validity of this perception of Southern martial superiority that lingers to this day. Topics include: the reasoning behind the Southern viewpoint of martial superiority, why the South expected to win, an ethnic and cultural comparison of the antebellum North and South, command leadership, variables affecting the outcomes of battles and Campaigns, which side faced the more difficult path to victory, demonstrated superior strategy and an evaluation of battle efficiency. Agendas and bias have affected Civil War writing since the antebellum days: here is an effort to provide an unbiased appraisal of the military performance of our Civil War ancestors, free of the influence of partisanship or sentiments regarding their propriety."--
Description
Publisher
McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers,
Journal
Book Title
Series
PubMed ID
DOI
ISSN
EISSN