Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHersch, Philip L.
dc.contributor.authorPelkowski, Jodi E.
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-14T23:56:03Z
dc.date.available2013-12-14T23:56:03Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-25
dc.identifier.citationHersch, Philip L.; Pelkowski, Jodi E. 2013. Voter demand for fluoridated water: a tale of two c(av)ities. Applied Economics Letters, v.21:no.1:pp.51-54en_US
dc.identifier.issn1350-4851
dc.identifier.otherWOS:000324794100012
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2013.837573
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/6959
dc.descriptionClick on the DOI link to access the article (may not be free).en_US
dc.description.abstractGovernment fluoridation of public water systems to promote dental health has long been advocated by many health associations, based on the findings of mainstream scientific studies. Despite this, fluoridation remains a controversial issue. Some in the public are antithetical to the science behind fluoridation while others view it as an infringement on individual choice. Voting data from referendums in two of the six largest US cities without fluoridated water (Portland, Oregon, and Wichita, Kansas) are used to examine the factors driving voter demand for and against fluoridation. Although regression analysis reveals differences between the cities, a strong commonality is greater support for fluoride coming from voting precincts with higher concentrations of college graduates. Additionally, even though advocates often laud water fluoridation as a relatively inexpensive way to extend dental health benefits to all children (regardless of income levels), presence of children in households surprisingly does not appear to translate into voter support. Lastly, after controlling for socio-economic factors, results suggest that opposition to fluoridation does not appear to come from the political centre, but from the libertarian right and environmental left.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis LTDen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesApplied Economics Letters;v.21:no.1
dc.subjectFluoridationen_US
dc.subjectReferendumsen_US
dc.subjectPublic wateren_US
dc.subjectDental healthen_US
dc.titleVoter demand for fluoridated water: a tale of two c(av)itiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.versionPeer reviewed
dc.rights.holderCopyright Taylor & Francis 2013


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record