dc.contributor.author | Toops, Gary H. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-10-02T22:42:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-10-02T22:42:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1991 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Toops, Gary H. 1991. Russian давать + infinitive: 'to give', 'to let', or 'to have'? -- Russian Language Journal, v.45, no.151-152, pp.39-54 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0036-0252 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10057/6519 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article examines a variety of sentence types, differing by virtue of the presence/absence of certain syntactic constituents (direct/indirect object) and the semantic properties of those constituents (animacy, physical transferability, etc.). The conclusion is that the verb давать has thus far undergone only partial grammaticalization towards being a causative auxiliary; that the incompleteness of the verb's grammaticalization as a causative auxiliary is due primarily to the homonymy, and hence ambiguity, of certain surface structures. It is finally proposed that давать be viewed as two distinct lexical items: 'to give' and 'to let' (the latter subcategorized for a number of syntactic and semantic constraints). | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | American Council of Teachers of Russian | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | RLJ;v.45 no.3 (Spring-Fall 1991) | |
dc.subject | Russian language--Grammar | en_US |
dc.subject | Russian language--Verb | en_US |
dc.subject | Russian language--Semantics | en_US |
dc.title | Russian давать + infinitive: 'to give', 'to let', or 'to have'? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |