• Login
    View Item 
    •   SOAR Home
    • Graduate School
    • The Capitol Graduate Research Summit in Topeka
    • Abstracts: 3rd Annual Capitol Graduate Research Summit
    • View Item
    •   SOAR Home
    • Graduate School
    • The Capitol Graduate Research Summit in Topeka
    • Abstracts: 3rd Annual Capitol Graduate Research Summit
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A bunch of garbage? How Sedgwick County’s trash came to be exported and its innovator ignored

    View
    Abstract
    Download
    Abstract
     
    Date
    2006-03-08
    Author
    Gumm, Angela Shannon
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The EPA estimates that the average American throws away 4.6 pounds of trash per day, of which 57%, or 114 million tons per year, is disposed of in one of the nation's 3,500 landfills. Despite the growing presence of trash, innovative trash-handling methods have not been adopted in Sedgwick County, and landfills and transfer stations have been the consistently chosen solutions of local leaders. The transferring of waste from our community and the attention given to "feel good" but non-cost effective measures like recycling, have minimized concern over the heaping trash problem. A local man, Bill Compton, has spent 35 of his 83 years trying to persuade local, state and national officials, as well as private industries, to adopt the technique of pyrolysis, which is based on ancient technology and works like a distiller to convert all non-metal trash into oil, carbon and gas, turning waste into profit. Compton built a prototype of his pyrolysis plant and successfully operated it for 300 hours, converting over a thousand of pounds of trash into oil, carbon and gas in his own backyard. In the late '90s local officials expressed interest in Compton’s pyrolysis proposal and innovative trash options in general, but when the County finally released their Five Year Solid Waste Plan Review in 2003, there was no mention of pyrolysis, technology, or innovations. This paper will examine why local officials over the last three decades have extensively debated the waste issue, yet maintained their temporary, non-innovative solutions like local landfills and transfer stations. Additionally, it will show to what extent alternative options, like pyrolysis, were ever considered.
    Description
    The project completed at the Wichita State University Department of History. Presented at the 3rd Annual Capitol Graduate Research Summit, Topeka, KS, 2006
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10057/5439
    Collections
    • Abstracts: 3rd Annual Capitol Graduate Research Summit [8]

    SOAR is a service of Wichita State University Libraries
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Site statistics 
     

     

    Browse

    All of SOARCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsType

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    SOAR is a service of Wichita State University Libraries
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Site statistics