Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSnyder, James J.
dc.contributor.authorSchrepferman, Lynn M.
dc.contributor.authorBullard, Lisha Marie
dc.contributor.authorMcEachern, Amber D.
dc.contributor.authorPatterson, Gerald R.
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-09T01:49:45Z
dc.date.available2012-09-09T01:49:45Z
dc.date.issued2012-08
dc.identifier.citationJames J. Snyder, Lynn P. Schrepferman, Lisha Bullard, Amber D. McEachern and Gerald R. Patterson (2012). Covert antisocial behavior, peer deviancy training, parenting processes, and sex differences in the development of antisocial behavior during childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 24 , pp 1117-1138en_US
dc.identifier.issn0954-5794
dc.identifier.issn1469-2198
dc.identifier.otherWOS:000306680100027
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412000570
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/5266
dc.descriptionClick on the DOI link below to access the article (may not be free).en_US
dc.description.abstractTwo longitudinal studies were used to examine the occurrence and consequences of peer deviancy training during childhood and the relative role of early covert antisocial behavior in risk for antisocial behavior in early adolescence. Peer deviancy training was apparent in a sample of at-risk first grade children, and it showed persistence and increased prevalence across the school year. Peer deviancy training, peer rejection, and unskilled parenting made additive contributions to the development of antisocial behavior during kindergarten and first grade and to antisocial behavior in fourth grade. Skilled parenting partially mitigated the association of peer deviancy training with antisocial behavior for boys. The appearance and growth of covert antisocial behavior was a predictor of fourth grade antisocial for boys and girls, more so than aggressive and overt antisocial behavior. Peer deviancy training and early covert antisocial behavior were key pathways to girls' antisocial behavior in fourth grade, and they complemented the roles of peer rejection and overt antisocial behavior for boys. The relationships of parenting and peer processes to trajectories of antisocial behavior were similar for boys and girls; but boys showed higher levels of antisocial behavior, were more involved in peer deviancy training, and were more likely to experience peer rejection.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDevelopment and Psychopathology; v.24 Special Issue 03
dc.subjectOnset conduct problemsen_US
dc.subjectLife-Course-Persistenten_US
dc.subjectDisruptive behavioren_US
dc.subjectElementary schoolen_US
dc.subjectYoung childrenen_US
dc.subjectAdolescenceen_US
dc.subjectGirlsen_US
dc.subjectTrajectoriesen_US
dc.subjectAggressionen_US
dc.subjectInterventionen_US
dc.titleCovert antisocial behavior, peer deviancy training, parenting processes, and sex differences in the development of antisocial behavior during childhooden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.versionPeer reviewed
dc.rights.holderCopyright Cambridge University Press, 2012


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record