Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreenberg, Gary
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-10T21:33:41Z
dc.date.available2012-05-10T21:33:41Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationGreenberg, G. 2011. "The Failure of Biogenetic Analysis in Psychology: Why Psychology is Not a Biological Science". RESEARCH IN HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. 8 (3-4): 173-191.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1542-7609
dc.identifier.issn1542-7617
dc.identifier.otherWOS: 000299575300002
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2011.625318
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/5097
dc.descriptionClick on the DOI link below to access the article (may not be free).en_US
dc.description.abstractMany define psychology as a biological science and emphasize brains and genes as major determinants of behavior. Instead, it is argued here that psychology is a unique biopsychosocial science able to stand on its own. Biogenetic processes are indeed relevant but are simply participating, not causal, factors in behavioral origins. Long neglected by biologists and social scientists, the importance of developmental processes is emphasized. The author takes issue with behavior geneticists and argues that development is bidirectional—internal and environmental phenomena influence behavior—probabilistically. The author favors a relatively new model with roots in ideas from contemporary physics: emergence and self-organization—“relational developmental systems.”en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Human Development;2011:, v.8, no.(3-4)
dc.subject.classificationPSYCHOLOGY
dc.titleThe failure of biogenetic analysis in psychology: Why psychology is not a biological scienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.versionPeer reviewed
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2011 Psychology Press


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record