Show simple item record

dc.contributorWichita State University. Department of Communication Sciences and Disordersen_US
dc.contributor.authorCranford, Jerry L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Douglas R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-29T18:34:33Z
dc.date.available2012-02-29T18:34:33Z
dc.date.issued1991-09en_US
dc.identifier1789305en_US
dc.identifier7909513en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe American journal of otology. 1991 Sep; 12(5): 357-64.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0192-9763en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://journals.lww.com/otology-neurotology/Abstract/1991/09000/Age_Related_Changes_in_Binaural_Processing_I_.9.aspxen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/4680
dc.descriptionClick on the link to access the article (may not be free).en_US
dc.description.abstractPossible age-related effects of speech competition in one ear on the late auditory (LAEP) and P300 event-related potentials recorded at the other ear were investigated with female volunteers. In each of the age categories of 20 to 34, 35 to 49, 50 to 64, and 65 to 80 years, 10 subjects were tested. While contralateral speech competition produced no significant amplitude or latency changes in the earlier auditory brainstem or middle latency responses, several age- and competition-related effects were observed with the later-occurring LAEP and P300 responses. With contralateral competition, the two oldest groups exhibited significantly larger reductions in the N1-P2 peak-to-peak amplitude of the LAEP than did the two youngest groups. While significant decreases in P300 amplitude also occurred with the competition, the magnitude of this effect was not age-related. In addition, small but statistically significant increases in the latency of all three major components, N1 and P2 of the LAEP, and P300, occurred in the presence of contralateral competition. These effects also did not differ among the four age groups. Thus, the LAEP appears to be sensitive to some form of age-related change in binaural processing or attention, although the P300, while sensitive to contralateral competition, did not reflect an age-related component in this effect.en_US
dc.format.extent357-64en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe American Journal of Otologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesv.12, no.5en_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and overen_US
dc.subject.meshAging/physiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshAudiometry, Evoked Responseen_US
dc.subject.meshAudiometry, Speechen_US
dc.subject.meshAuditory Thresholden_US
dc.subject.meshDichotic Listening Testsen_US
dc.subject.meshEvoked Potentials, Auditoryen_US
dc.subject.meshEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stemen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHearing/physiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshHearing Disorders/physiopathologyen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.titleAge-related changes in binaural processing: I. Evoked potential findingsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.coverage.spacialUnited Statesen_US
dc.description.versionpeer revieweden_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 1991, The American Journal of Otologyen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record