• Login
    View Item 
    •   Shocker Open Access Repository Home
    • Fairmount College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
    • Chemistry and Biochemistry
    • CHEM Faculty Scholarship
    • CHEM Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    •   Shocker Open Access Repository Home
    • Fairmount College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
    • Chemistry and Biochemistry
    • CHEM Faculty Scholarship
    • CHEM Faculty Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Intrinsic hydration of monopositive uranyl hydroxide, nitrate, and acetate cations

    Date
    2004-06-01
    Author
    Chien, Winnie
    Anbalagan, Victor
    Zandler, Melvin E.
    Van Stipdonk, Michael J.
    Hanna, Dorothy A.
    Gresham, Garold L.
    Groenewold, Gary S.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 2004 Jun; 15(6): 777-83.
    Abstract
    The intrinsic hydration of three monopositive uranyl-anion complexes (UO(2)A)(+) (where A = acetate, nitrate, or hydroxide) was investigated using ion-trap mass spectrometry (IT-MS). The relative rates for the formation of the monohydrates [(UO(2)A)(H(2)O)](+), with respect to the anion, followed the trend: Acetate > or = nitrate > hydroxide. This finding was rationalized in terms of the donation of electron density by the strongly basic OH(-) to the uranyl metal center, thereby reducing the Lewis acidity of U and its propensity to react with incoming nucleophiles, viz., H(2)O. An alternative explanation is that the more complex acetate and nitrate anions provide increased degrees of freedom that could accommodate excess energy from the hydration reaction. The monohydrates also reacted with water, forming dihydrates and then trihydrates. The rates for formation of the nitrate and acetate dihydrates [(UO(2)A)(H(2)O)(2)](+) were very similar to the rates for formation of the monohydrates; the presence of the first H(2)O ligand had no influence on the addition of the second. In contrast, formation of the [(UO(2)OH)(H(2)O)(2)](+) was nearly three times faster than the formation of the monohydrate.
    Description
    Click on the DOI link below to access the article (may not be free).
    URI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2004.01.013
    http://hdl.handle.net/10057/4372
    Collections
    • CHEM Faculty Publications

    Browse

    All of Shocker Open Access RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV