Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Nate M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWeaver, V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorParks, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLydy, Michael J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-24T17:48:39Z
dc.date.available2012-01-24T17:48:39Z
dc.date.issued2003-04en_US
dc.identifier12712295en_US
dc.identifier0357245en_US
dc.identifier.citationArchives of environmental contamination and toxicology. 2003 Apr; 44(3): 351-9.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0090-4341en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00244-002-2043-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/4140
dc.descriptionClick on the DOI link below to access the article (may not be free).en_US
dc.description.abstractUrban development alters the natural hydrological conditions of many streams and rivers often resulting in the degradation of water quality, physical habitat, and biotic integrity of lotic systems. Restoration projects attempt to improve and maintain the ecological integrity of urban streams; however, few projects have quantified improvements to stream ecology following implementation of restoration measures. This paper summarizes pre-restoration data collected as part of an urban stream restoration project on Gypsum Creek in Wichita, Kansas. Water quality monitoring revealed eutrophic conditions in the stream and the presence of pesticides. Channelization has led to changes in physical habitat including bank erosion, sedimentation, loss of substrate and channel diversity, elimination of in-stream aquatic habitat, removal of riparian vegetation, and decreased base flows. Benthic macroinvertebrate communities appear degraded with more than 90% of individuals collected described as tolerant to anthropogenic stressors. Fish communities were assessed with an Index of Biotic Integrity and were rated as poor to fair, with trophic structure dominated by generalists, no sensitive species present, and one-third of the species collected considered non-native. Overall, the data collected strongly suggest that site-specific restoration measures need to be implemented in order to improve and maintain the ecological condition of Gypsum Creek. Recommendations for improvements have been made to city managers, with implementation beginning in spring 2003 (dependent upon funding availability).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer New Yorken_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesArchives of environmental contamination and toxicologyen_US
dc.sourceNLMen_US
dc.subjectResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.en_US
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_US
dc.subject.meshCity Planningen_US
dc.subject.meshConservation of Natural Resourcesen_US
dc.subject.meshEcosystemen_US
dc.subject.meshEutrophicationen_US
dc.subject.meshFishes/growth & developmenten_US
dc.subject.meshFresh Water/analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshInvertebrates/growth & developmenten_US
dc.subject.meshKansasen_US
dc.subject.meshPesticides/toxicityen_US
dc.subject.meshUrban Renewalen_US
dc.subject.meshWater Pollutants, Chemical/toxicityen_US
dc.titleAn assessment of water quality, physical habitat, and biological integrity of an urban stream in Wichita, Kansas, prior to restoration improvements (phase I)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.versionpeer revieweden_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2003, Springer New Yorken_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record