Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBest, Patricia K.
dc.contributor.authorGundeti, S.
dc.contributor.authorPendse, Ravi
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-20T15:03:21Z
dc.date.available2011-09-20T15:03:21Z
dc.date.issued2003-10-06
dc.identifier.citationBest, P.; Gundeti, S.; Pendse, R.; , "Self-learning ad-hoc routing protocol," Vehicular Technology Conference, 2003. VTC 2003-Fall. 2003 IEEE 58th , vol.5, no., pp. 2824- 2828 Vol.5, 6-9 Oct. 2003 doi: 10.1109/VETECF.2003.1286118en_US
dc.identifier.isbn0780379543
dc.identifier.issn1090-3038
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/3796
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/VETECF.2003.1286118
dc.descriptionThe full text of this article is not available on SOAR. WSU users can access the article via IEEE Xplore database licensed by University Libraries: http://libcat.wichita.edu/vwebv/holdingsInfo?bibId=1045954en_US
dc.description.abstractAs the technologies for ad-hoc networks emerge, an ad-hoc routing protocol that can supply connectivity to mobile devices while utilizing a minimal amount of bandwidth as overhead becomes increasingly important. Minimal packet delay and the conservation of power and memory in wireless devices must also be considered. In this research, the self-learning ad-hoc routing protocol (SARP) is proposed. This protocol discovers information about the network topology while forwarding packets that it would have to process anyway. Due to the large number of routes learned through forwarding packets and the route discovery procedure, the overhead created by the routing protocol is reduced. The performance of SARP is compared with AODV in terms of data packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, control overhead, average energy consumption and average number of routes stored in the routing table of each node at any given time. The simulation results show that SARP had up to a 34% reduction in the percentage of overhead generated by the routing protocol and up to a 26% increase in the data packet delivery ratio over AODV. The average energy consumed by SARP was comparable with that of AODV although the average end-to-end delay for SARP was slightly higher than AODV at high mobility rates. The average number of routes stored in the routing table of each node in SARP was always greater than in AODV.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVehicular Technology Conference, 2003. VTC 2003-Fall. 2003 IEEE 58th;vol.5, no., pp. 2824- 2828
dc.subjectAd hoc networksen_US
dc.subjectBroadcastingen_US
dc.subjectDelay effectsen_US
dc.subjectEnergy consumptionen_US
dc.subjectNetwork topologyen_US
dc.subjectRouting protocolsen_US
dc.subjectWireless application protocolen_US
dc.titleSelf-learning ad-hoc routing protocolen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US
dc.description.versionPeer reviewed article
dc.rights.holder© IEEE, 2003


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record