Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSteck, James E.
dc.contributor.authorReed, Scott
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-02T18:43:38Z
dc.date.available2011-09-02T18:43:38Z
dc.date.copyright2010en
dc.date.issued2010-12
dc.identifier.othert10112
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/3741
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.)--Wichita State University, College of Engineering, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis work presents the design and simulation of a model reference adaptive flight control system for general aviation. The controller is based on previous adaptive control research conducted at Wichita State University (WSU) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Ames Research Center. The control system is designed for longitudinal control of a Beech Bonanza given the commands of pitch rate and airspeed. The structure of the controller includes a first-order model follower, proportional-integral (PI) controller, inverse controller, and adaptation element. Two adaptation methods were considered, the WSU-developed Adaptive Bias Corrector (ABC) and the Optimal Control Modification (OCM). The ABC is used with two error schemes, adapting to the modeling-error and the tracking-error. Three variations of the OCM are presented, which differ in the parameterization of the adaptive signal. The first is called OCM-Linear (OCM-L), where the adaptive signal is linearly related to the states. The second variation is OCM-Bias (OCM-B), which only includes a bias term. The third is the OCM-Linear and Bias (OCM-LB), a combination of the previous two variations. To design the controllers, varied values of the PI gains and adaptive gains were evaluated based on time response tracking of a pitch doublet and time delay margin. The time delay margin is based on error metrics developed at NASA Ames. Of the five controllers presented, the OCM-L and ABC with tracking-error adaptation performed the best. The ABC with modeling-error adaptation did not track the pitch doublet. The OCM-B and OCM-LB are good controllers but had worse performance than OCM-Linear in tracking and time delay margin, respectively.en_US
dc.format.extentxvi, 80 leaves, ill.en
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWichita State Universityen_US
dc.rightsCopyright Scott Reed, 2010. All rights reserveden
dc.subject.lcshElectronic dissertationsen
dc.titleDemonstration of the optimal control modification for general aviation: design and simulationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • AE Theses and Dissertations
    Electronic copies of theses and dissertations defended in the Department of Aerospace Engineering
  • CE Theses and Dissertations
    Doctoral and Master's theses authored by the College of Engineering graduate students
  • Master's Theses
    This collection includes Master's theses completed at the Wichita State University Graduate School (Fall 2005 --)

Show simple item record