Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJorgensen, Michael J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKirby, Jonathan P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-01T15:12:14Z
dc.date.available2010-09-01T15:12:14Z
dc.date.issued2009-12en_US
dc.identifier.othert09067en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/2525
dc.descriptionThesis (M.S.)--Wichita State University, College of Engineering, Dept. of Industrialand Manufacturing Engineeringen_US
dc.description.abstractPrevious studies have shown that musculoskeletal discomfort can result from long duration of computer use with the following conditions: improper location of the keyboard and mouse, monitor too high, and a lack of forearm support from either the worksurface or chair armrests. The office workstation is best configured with the keyboard and mouse at or below elbow level, the monitor at or below horizontal eye level, and the forearms supported. An adjustable chair and workstation can also help achieve these layouts. Previous assessment methods have resulted in long checklists often including questions or assessments of characteristics that are not supported by scientific evidence. This research developed an evidence-based computer workstation checklist to assess both configuration and forearm support issues related to the keyboard, mouse, monitor, and chair. The goal of this research was to test this checklist's repeatability among different raters. A pilot study was performed with results that indicated a high percent of agreement (= 66%) among most of the raters and overall kappa coefficients ranging from 0.44 (moderate) to 1.00 (almost perfect agreement). Modifications to the checklist were made based on feedback from the raters. The main study had results with a high percent of agreement (= 70%) among many of the raters and kappa coefficients from 0.09 (slight) to 1.00 (almost perfect agreement). These kappa scores can likely be attributed to the rater's lack of ergonomic experience and training on the checklist. Even with these kappa coefficients there is still evidence of this checklist being a repeatable tool based on the high percent of agreement. This could suggest that this checklist can be used by multiple raters for assessing office workstation configuration and forearms support issues.en_US
dc.format.extentx, 124 p.en_US
dc.format.extent2373354 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWichita State Universityen_US
dc.titleAssessment of an evidence based postural support computer workstation checklisten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record