Health literacy, health outcomes and equity: A trend analysis based on a population survey
Keene Woods, Nikki
Chesser, Amy K.
MetadataShow full item record
Keene Woods, N., Ali, U., Medina, M., Reyes, J., & Chesser, A. K. (2023). Health Literacy, Health Outcomes and Equity: A Trend Analysis Based on a Population Survey. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 14, 21501319231156132. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319231156132
Health literacy continues to be an issue among minority groups. Population surveys are one strategy used to help better understand health disparities. The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) in Kansas added health literacy questions to the survey in 2012. This study examined population health literacy levels and health trends from 2012 to 2018. The health status variables included health care coverage status, general health rating, presence of chronic conditions, and length of time since the last check-up. The percentage of individuals reporting low health literacy decreased from 67% in 2012 to 51% in 2018. The percentage of participants with income levels less than 15,000 dollars was 9% in 2012 and 7% in 2018. Health literacy was lowest among the age group 18 to 24-year-olds, those who identified as multiracial, separated, not graduated from high school, out of work for more than 1 year, income less than 10,000 dollars with other living arrangements, and living in a suburban county of metropolitan statistical area. Additionally, many health conditions improved, and those reporting health insurance increased slightly. The study demonstrates how health literacy continues to be an issue, and how education and primary prevention are necessary to improve limited health literacy and health outcomes. Findings from both state-level and national BRFSS population surveys can help educate the public health and clinical health services workforce to provide better care and address health disparities for high risk populations.
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license. Disclaimer. You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits. Notices: You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation. No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Does Canada’s national health care system provide better patient satisfaction and access to health care than the United States’ health care system? Grove, Caleb (Wichita State University, Dept. of Physician Assistant, 2006-05)The United States spends more money on health care than any other country in the world, yet there are millions of uninsured Americans. Lacking health insurance in the U.S. has many consequences such as not seeking preventative ...
Health Care Reform Fox, Charles R. (National Public Radio. Morning Edition, 2008)
Improving Latino health equity through Spanish language interpreter advocacy in Kansas Showstack, Rachel E.; Guzman, Kelly; Chesser, Amy K.; Woods, Nikki Keene (SAGE, 2018-12-21)INTRODUCTION:: Federal law requires any agency receiving federal aid to take "reasonable steps" to provide meaningful access to qualified limited English proficient (LEP) individuals. However, policies for the provision ...