• Login
    View Item 
    •   Shocker Open Access Repository Home
    • Graduate Student Research
    • GRASP: Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects
    • Proceedings 2009: 5th Annual Symposium: Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects
    • View Item
    •   Shocker Open Access Repository Home
    • Graduate Student Research
    • GRASP: Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects
    • Proceedings 2009: 5th Annual Symposium: Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effectiveness and Invasiveness in Patient Medical Decision Aids

    View/Open
    GRASP5_50.pdf (126.2Kb)
    Date
    2009-05-01
    Author
    Hulsey, Lukas
    Shaffer, Victoria A.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Hulsey, Lukas and Victoria A. Shaffer(2009). Effectiveness and Invasiveness in Patient Medical Decision Aids . In Proceedings: 5th Annual Symposium: Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects. Wichita, KS: Wichita State University, p. 112-113
    Abstract
    This research tested the hypothesis that including anecdotal evidence impacts treatment choice by influencing the trade-off between effectiveness and invasiveness. In addition, the role of decision-making style was examined. Participants imagined making a decision between two treatment options for angina (chest pain). Bypass is more effective, but more invasive; balloon angioplasty is less effective, but less invasive. Participants received statistics about the effectiveness of the two treatments, testimonials, or both. They then indicated their choice between the two treatment options and rated the importance of the effectiveness and invasiveness of the treatment chosen to their decision. A subset of the participants also completed the Decision Making Styles Inventory (DMI) which describes individuals on three styles of decision-making: analytical, intuitive, and regret-based. Treatment choice was not shown to differ between experimental conditions. However, ratings of the importance of treatment invasiveness and effectiveness did explain a significant amount of the variance in treatment choice. Therefore, the trade-off between effectiveness and invasiveness appears to be an important source of individual differences in treatment choice. In addition, this research provides some evidence that individual differences in decision-making style play a role in the impact of anecdotal evidence on treatment choice.
    Description
    Paper presented to the 5th Annual Symposium on Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects (GRASP) held at the Hughes Metropolitan Complex, Wichita State University, May 1, 2009.

    Research completed at the Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10057/2284
    Collections
    • Proceedings 2009: 5th Annual Symposium: Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects
    • PSY Graduate Student Conference Papers

    Browse

    All of Shocker Open Access RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV