Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorvan Patten, Ryan V.
dc.contributor.authorIverson, Grant L.
dc.contributor.authorMuzeau, Mélissa A.
dc.contributor.authorVanRavenhorst-Bell, Heidi A .
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-27T14:37:48Z
dc.date.available2021-11-27T14:37:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-21
dc.identifier.citationVan Patten R, Iverson GL, Muzeau MA and VanRavenhorst-Bell HA (2021) Test–Retest Reliability and Reliable Change Estimates for Four Mobile Cognitive Tests Administered Virtually in Community-Dwelling Adults. Front. Psychol. 12:734947. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734947en_US
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.734947
dc.identifier.urihttps://soar.wichita.edu/handle/10057/22324
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2021 Van Patten, Iverson, Muzeau and VanRavenhorst-Bell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Remote mobile cognitive testing (MCT) is an expanding area of research, but psychometric data supporting these measures are limited. We provide preliminary data on test–retest reliability and reliable change estimates in four MCTs from SWAY Medical, Inc. Methods: Fifty-five adults from the U.S. Midwest completed the MCTs remotely on their personal mobile devices once per week for 3 consecutive weeks, while being supervised with a video-based virtual connection. The cognitive assessment measured simple reaction time (“Reaction Time”), go/no-go response inhibition (“Impulse Control”), timed visual processing (“Inspection Time”), and working memory (“Working Memory”). For each cognitive test except Working Memory, we analyzed both millisecond (ms) responses and an overall SWAY composite score. Results: The mean age of the sample was 26.69years (SD=9.89; range=18–58). Of the 55 adults, 38 (69.1%) were women and 49 (89.1%) used an iPhone. Friedman’s ANOVAs examining differences across testing sessions were nonsignificant (ps>0.31). Intraclass correlations for Weeks 1–3 were: Reaction Time (ms): 0.83, Reaction Time (SWAY): 0.83, Impulse Control (ms): 0.68, Impulse Control (SWAY): 0.80, Inspection Time (ms): 0.75, Inspection Time (SWAY): 0.75, and Working Memory (SWAY): 0.88. Intraclass correlations for Weeks 1–2 were: Reaction Time (ms): 0.75, Reaction Time (SWAY): 0.74, Impulse Control (ms): 0.60, Impulse Control (SWAY): 0.76, Inspection Time (ms): 0.79, Inspection Time (SWAY): 0.79, and Working Memory (SWAY): 0.83. Natural distributions of difference scores were calculated and reliable change estimates are presented for 70, 80, and 90% CIs. Conclusion: Test–retest reliability was adequate or better for the MCTs in this virtual remote testing study. Reliable change estimates allow for the determination of whether a particular level of improvement or decline in performance is within the range of probable measurement error. Additional reliability and validity data are needed in other age groups.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in Psychology;Vol. 12
dc.subjectMobile cognitive testingen_US
dc.subjectEcological momentary assessmenten_US
dc.subjectTechnologyen_US
dc.subjectPsychometricsen_US
dc.subjectAssessmenten_US
dc.subjectReaction timeen_US
dc.subjectAttentionen_US
dc.subjectWorking memoryen_US
dc.titleTest–retest reliability and reliable change estimates for four mobile cognitive tests administered virtually in community-dwelling adultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2021 Van Patten, Iverson, Muzeau and VanRavenhorst-Bell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record