• Login
    View Item 
    •   Shocker Open Access Repository Home
    • Graduate Student Research
    • ETD: Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Shocker Open Access Repository Home
    • Graduate Student Research
    • ETD: Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    • Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Is 4k really worth it? A mixed-methods approach to exploring the uses and benefits of high-resolution computer displays for different user populations

    View/Open
    dissertation (12.97Mb)
    Date
    2019-12
    Author
    Patzer, Christal
    Advisor
    Chaparro, Barbara S.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Advancements in display technology made it easier for manufacturers to develop and sell high-resolution displays (HRDs) to consumers, and HRDs are frequently marketed as beneficial for graphically intense tasks. Therefore, it is important to understand the tasks and user populations that actually benefit from using HRDs. Evaluating display technology's impact on user performance and perception largely focuses on three display scenarios: multi-monitors, pixel density, and large displays (greater than 34"). However, gaps exist in the body of literature. The purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of using HRDs on productivity and experience for different user populations using a mixed-methods approach. Data were collected and analyzed over three studies: (1) an online survey to identify commonly performed computer activities and the perceived benefits of using HRDs; (2) interviews of current HRD users from various user populations to explore the use cases, perceived advantages, and contributing factors of perceived benefits of using HRDs; and (3) an empirical study to compare the effects of display resolution on productivity and experience using representative tasks for two user populations: PC video gamers and digital creatives. Results from Studies 1 and 2 suggested that improvements to graphics quality, efficiency, screen real estate, and experience contributed to the advantages of using HRDs. Additionally, these results also indicated that, to empirically compare productivity and experience differences, tasks should emphasize color quality, visual clarity, small detail visibility. Results from Study 3 revealed few objective productivity improvements when using HRDs, except when searching realistic images. Participants were faster, more successful, more efficient, and less frustrated searching for small targets using high-resolution. However, subjective results demonstrated higher preference for HRDs due to better sharpness, contrast, readability, and overall impression.
    Description
    Thesis (Ph.D.)-- Wichita State University, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Dept. of Psychology
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10057/17107
    Collections
    • Dissertations
    • LAS Theses and Dissertations
    • PSY Theses and Dissertations

    Browse

    All of Shocker Open Access RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2023  DuraSpace
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV