Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKeating, Donald A.
dc.contributor.authorStanford, Thomas G.
dc.contributor.authorBardo, John W.
dc.contributor.authorDunlap, Duane D.
dc.contributor.authorDepew, Dennis R.
dc.contributor.authorBertoline, Gary R.
dc.contributor.authorSchuver, Mark T.
dc.contributor.authorDeLoatch, Eugene M.
dc.contributor.authorTricamo, Stephen J.
dc.contributor.authorMcHenry, Albert L.
dc.contributor.authorLindquist, Timothy E.
dc.contributor.authorTidwell, Joseph P.
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Harvey J.
dc.contributor.authorNoori, Mohammad N.
dc.contributor.authorQuick, David H.
dc.contributor.authorOlson, Roger N.
dc.contributor.authorTruesdale, Samuel
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-12T18:02:32Z
dc.date.available2019-12-12T18:02:32Z
dc.date.issued2007-06
dc.identifier.citationKeating, D. A., Stanford, T. G., Bardo, J. W., Dunlap, D. D., Depew, D. R., et al., (2007). "Faculty reward system reform for advancement of professional engineering education for innovation: Rethinking a new model template for unit criteria of professionally oriented faculty." 114th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition; Honolulu, HI
dc.identifier.issn2153-5965
dc.identifier.urihttps://peer.asee.org/1626
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/16946
dc.descriptionClick on the URL link to access the article (may not be free).
dc.description.abstractThis is the third of three invited papers prepared for a special panel session of the National Collaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform that is focusing one of its primary tasks on faculty reward system reform in order to advance professional engineering graduate education for enhanced creative engineering practice for technology development & innovation across the country. Based upon the findings of the first two papers of this panel session and the positive response for faculty reward system reform perceived at the 2006 annual ASEE conference, this paper recommends guidelines and a path forward for developing new unit criteria for faculty in professionally oriented graduate engineering programs. The suggested framework correlates with the nine levels of proficiency in the practice of engineering recognized by the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE), the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), and that used in industry and government service.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)
dc.relation.ispartofseries114th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition, 2007
dc.subjectEngineering education
dc.titleFaculty reward system reform for advancement of professional engineering education for innovation: Rethinking a new model template for unit criteria of professionally oriented faculty
dc.typeConference paper
dc.rights.holderCopyright ASEE


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record