Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKeating, Donald A.
dc.contributor.authorStanford, Thomas G.
dc.contributor.authorBardo, John W.
dc.contributor.authorDunlap, Duane D.
dc.contributor.authorDepew, Dennis R.
dc.contributor.authorLatif, Niaz
dc.contributor.authorBertoline, Gary R.
dc.contributor.authorTricamo, Stephen J.
dc.contributor.authorMcHenry, Albert L.
dc.contributor.authorDeLoatch, Eugene M.
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Harvey J.
dc.contributor.authorNoori, Mohammad N.
dc.contributor.authorBennett, Ronald J.
dc.contributor.authorSnellenberger, Jay M.
dc.contributor.authorTruesdale, Samuel
dc.identifier.citationKeating, D. A., Stanford, T. G., Bardo, J. W., Dunlap, D. D., Depew, D. R., et al., (2006), "Faculty reward system reform: Beginning phase II -Setting criteria for professionally oriented faculty in engineering and technology," 113th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition; Chicago, IL
dc.descriptionClick on the URL link to access the article (may not be free).
dc.description.abstractThis is the second of two papers prepared for a special panel session of the National Collaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform that is focusing one of its primary tasks on faculty reward system reform. Founded in 2000, the National Collaborative Task Force is an initiative of the ASEE-Graduate Studies Division, Corporate Members Council, and College Industry Partnership Division. The National Collaborative is comprised of leaders from industry, academia, and government all coming together to advance professional engineering graduate education for the advancement of engineering practice in the national interest to enhance U.S. competitiveness. Using the findings of the 2005 Task Force panel, 1,2,3 which investigated the commonality of faculty reward systems in other professions such as law, this papersuggests parallel criteria for professionally oriented faculty reward systems in engineering and technology education that complement scientific research and that better support the professional scholarship, teaching, and engagement functions of engineering practice for technology development & innovation.
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)
dc.relation.ispartofseries113th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition, 2006
dc.subjectEngineering education
dc.titleFaculty reward system reform: Beginning phase II: Setting criteria for professionally oriented faculty in engineering and technology
dc.typeConference paper
dc.rights.holderCopyright ASEE

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record