• Login
    View Item 
    •   Shocker Open Access Repository Home
    • Fairmount College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
    • President John W. Bardo: Selected Research Publications
    • View Item
    •   Shocker Open Access Repository Home
    • Fairmount College of Liberal Arts and Sciences
    • President John W. Bardo: Selected Research Publications
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Faculty reward system reform: Beginning phase II: Setting criteria for professionally oriented faculty in engineering and technology

    Date
    2006-06
    Author
    Keating, Donald A.
    Stanford, Thomas G.
    Bardo, John W.
    Dunlap, Duane D.
    Depew, Dennis R.
    Latif, Niaz
    Bertoline, Gary R.
    Tricamo, Stephen J.
    McHenry, Albert L.
    DeLoatch, Eugene M.
    Palmer, Harvey J.
    Noori, Mohammad N.
    Bennett, Ronald J.
    Snellenberger, Jay M.
    Truesdale, Samuel
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Keating, D. A., Stanford, T. G., Bardo, J. W., Dunlap, D. D., Depew, D. R., et al., (2006), "Faculty reward system reform: Beginning phase II -Setting criteria for professionally oriented faculty in engineering and technology," 113th Annual ASEE Conference and Exposition; Chicago, IL
    Abstract
    This is the second of two papers prepared for a special panel session of the National Collaborative Task Force on Engineering Graduate Education Reform that is focusing one of its primary tasks on faculty reward system reform. Founded in 2000, the National Collaborative Task Force is an initiative of the ASEE-Graduate Studies Division, Corporate Members Council, and College Industry Partnership Division. The National Collaborative is comprised of leaders from industry, academia, and government all coming together to advance professional engineering graduate education for the advancement of engineering practice in the national interest to enhance U.S. competitiveness. Using the findings of the 2005 Task Force panel, 1,2,3 which investigated the commonality of faculty reward systems in other professions such as law, this papersuggests parallel criteria for professionally oriented faculty reward systems in engineering and technology education that complement scientific research and that better support the professional scholarship, teaching, and engagement functions of engineering practice for technology development & innovation.
    Description
    Click on the URL link to access the article (may not be free).
    URI
    https://peer.asee.org/217
    http://hdl.handle.net/10057/16943
    Collections
    • President John W. Bardo: Selected Research Publications

    Browse

    All of Shocker Open Access RepositoryCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2021  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    DSpace Express is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV