dc.contributor.advisor | Muma, Richard D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Armour, Angela F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Williamson, Robin K. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2008-10-22T03:34:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2008-10-22T03:34:36Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-05 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1593 | |
dc.description | A project presented to the Department of Physician Assistant of Wichita State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Physician Assistant. | en |
dc.description.abstract | In the 1960s, it was discovered that there was a significant need for more
physicians to serve the U.S. population, especially in rural and medically underserved
communities. The Physician Assistant profession was built with the hope of being an extension
to physicians to help meet these needs. However, there continues to be large numbers of
communities in every state that lack access to health care. The purpose of this study was to
explore the factors influencing Physician Assistant practice location choice. Methodology: A
retrospective cross-sectional study of PA student records in a mid-western rural-focused
physician assistant program was conducted. Application data from PA graduates in 2003, 2004, and 2005 were evaluated for desired community size of practice location at the time of
application compared to actual job placement and community size after graduation. A written
survey was mailed to the same classes of graduates to assess factors that influenced selection of
their first and current practice location. Data were analyzed using frequency counts and chisquare
tests. Results: There was a 44% response rate from the 126 eligible to participate in the
survey. It was noted that 60% of applicants listed their preference specialty as family practice;
however, less than one-third of graduates were currently working in the family practice specialty. Similarly, applicants noted a preference to work in rural areas, but upon graduation for their first
job and current job they tended to work in urban areas by a large percentage. There were five
different factors with significant relationships in regard to PA practice location (p<.05):
Significant others support of location, quality of life, employment opportunities for the
significant other, scope of practice and recreation. A significant others support of the location appeared to be most important. Conclusion: Choice of employment at the time of application
compared to graduation was markedly different. Choice of practice location did not appear to be a decision made by the graduate physician assistant alone, but also in conjunction with their
significant other. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | This project was funded in part by the Workforce Diversity Initiative Grant,
funded by US/DHHS, grant number D57HP05123, 2005-2008, Richard Muma, PI. | en |
dc.format.extent | 91269 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.publisher | Wichita State University. Graduate School | en |
dc.subject | Physician assistants | en |
dc.subject | Rural areas | en |
dc.subject | Employment | en |
dc.subject | Health care | en |
dc.subject | Workforce development | en |
dc.title | Factors influencing rural physician assistant practice | en |
dc.type | Research project | en |