Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKilgus, Stephen P.
dc.contributor.authorvon der Embse, Nathaniel P.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Crystal N.
dc.contributor.authorVan Wie, Michael P.
dc.contributor.authorSims, Wesley A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-19T20:40:24Z
dc.date.available2018-12-19T20:40:24Z
dc.date.issued2018-12
dc.identifier.citationKilgus, S. P., von der Embse, N. P., Taylor, C. N., Van Wie, M. P., & Sims, W. A. (2018). Diagnostic accuracy of a universal screening multiple gating procedure: A replication study. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(4), 582-589en_US
dc.identifier.issn1045-3830
dc.identifier.otherWOS:000451775200009
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000246
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/15716
dc.descriptionClick on the DOI link to access the article (may not be free).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this diagnostic accuracy study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity (among other indicators) of three universal screening approaches, including the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener (SAEBRS), a SAEBRS-based teacher nomination tool, and a multiple gating procedure (MGP). Each screening approach was compared to the BASC-2 Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (BESS), which served as a criterion indicator of student social-emotional and behavioral risk. All data were collected in a concurrent fashion. Participants included 704 students (47.7% female) from four elementary schools within the Midwestern United States (21.6% were at risk per the BESS). Findings yielded support for the SAEBRS, with sensitivity = .93 (95% confidence interval [.89-.97]), specificity = .91 (.89-.93), and correct classification = .92. Findings further supported the MGP, which yielded sensitivity = .81 (.74-.87), specificity = .93 (.91-.95), and correct classification = .91. In contrast, the teacher nomination tool yielded questionable levels of diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity = .86 [.80-.91], specificity = .74 [.70-.78], and correct classification = .76). Overall, findings were particularly supportive of SAEBRS diagnostic accuracy, suggesting the MGP might also serve as an acceptable approach to universal screening. Other implications for practice and directions for future research are discussed.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Missouri Alumni Association, Richard Wallace Faculty Incentive Grant.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSchool Psychology Quarterly;v.33:no.4
dc.subjectUniversal screeningen_US
dc.subjectBehavioral assessmenten_US
dc.subjectRating scalesen_US
dc.titleDiagnostic accuracy of a universal screening multiple gating procedure: a replication studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2018 American Psychological Associationen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record