The repository is currently being upgraded to DSpace 7. Temporarily, only admins can login. Submission of items and changes to existing items is prohibited until the completion of this upgrade process.
Determination of carbon monoxide detector location in general aviation aircraft to improve safety
Date
2008-04-25Author
Ahmady, Ali
Assadi, Morteza
Muthuswamy, Selvakumar
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Ahmady,Ali, Assadi, Morteza , Muthuswamy, Selvakumar (2008) . Determination of carbon monoxide detector location in general aviation aircraft to improve safety . In Proceedings: 4th Annual Symposium: Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects. Wichita, KS: Wichita State University, p.145-146
Abstract
There are many sources of carbon monoxide (CO) leakage into the cabin of General Aviation (GA) aircraft.
Exposure to CO, which is part of the engine exhaust in GA aircraft, can impede the pilot’s ability to direct the airplane
which may lead to accidents. In order to prevent accidents, an electrochemical CO detector can be used to alert the pilot to
the presence of CO. The objective of this study was to determine the best location for CO detector placement in GA aircraft.
Early CO detection as well as visibility and accessibility of the detector were some of the parameters involved in
determining the optimum CO detector location. Considering these issues, five detector placement locations were considered:
visor, instrument panel, leg area of front seats (left and right sides), and rear seat. Field tests to monitor CO levels during GA
flights were conducted at Kansas State University at Salina using data logging CO detectors. The results from these
measurements have been categorized according to several different variables and then analyzed statistically. Measurements
taken so far during the summer and early fall indicate that the majority of CO exposure events occurred on the ground
before take-off. During such ground-based CO exposure events, the timing was consistent with open windows allowing
exhaust fumes to enter the cockpit area. This paper will also discuss the results of additional measurements taken during the
winter months when other modes of CO exposure may be involved.
Description
Paper presented to the 4th Annual Symposium on Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects (GRASP) held at the Hughes Metropolitan Complex, Wichita State University, April 25, 2008. Research completed at the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, College of Engineering.