Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLambdin, Charles Garett
dc.contributor.authorShaffer, Victoria A.
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-05T17:00:46Z
dc.date.available2008-06-05T17:00:46Z
dc.date.issued2008-04-25
dc.identifier.citationLambdin, Charles, Shaffer, Victoria , (2008) . The great between-subjects assumption . In Proceedings: 4th Annual Symposium: Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects. Wichita, KS: Wichita State University, p.117-118en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/1387
dc.descriptionPaper presented to the 4th Annual Symposium on Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects (GRASP) held at the Hughes Metropolitan Complex, Wichita State University, April 25, 2008.en
dc.descriptionResearch completed at the Department of Psychology, Fairmount College of Liberal Arts and Sciencesen
dc.description.abstractThere seems to be an assumption that some judgment and decision-making (JDM) findings will only be supported in between-subjects designs, even though between-subjects results can be misleading. This paper tested this assumption by taking two famous between-subjects JDM findings (Shafir, 1993; Tversky & Kahneman, 1986) and replicating them within subjects. Replicating within subjects allowed us to conduct a manipulation check, and the qualitative data gathered surprisingly suggest the original experiments lack construct validityen
dc.format.extent159552 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherWichita State University. Graduate School.en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGRASPen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesv.4en
dc.titleThe great between-subjects assumptionen
dc.typeConference paperen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record