Factors influencing rural physician assistant practice
Date
2008-04-25Author
Armour, Angela F.
Williamson, Robin K.
Muma, Richard D.
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Armour, Angela, Williamson, Robin, Muma, Richard D. (2008) Factors influencing rural physician assistant practice. In Proceedings: 4th Annual Symposium: Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects. Wichita, KS: Wichita State University, p.83-84
Abstract
In the 1960s, it was discovered
that there was a significant need for more physicians to
serve the U.S. population, especially in rural and medically
underserved communities. The Physician Assistant
profession was built with the hope of being an extension to
physicians to help meet these needs. However, there
continues to be large numbers of communities in every
state that lack access to health care. The purpose of this
study was to explore the factors influencing Physician
Assistant practice location choice. Methodology: A
retrospective cross-sectional study of PA student records in
a mid-western rural-focused physician assistant program
was conducted. Application data from PA graduates in
2003, 2004, and 2005 were evaluated for desired
community size of practice location at the time of
application compared to actual job placement and
community size after graduation. A written survey was
mailed to the same classes of graduates to assess factors
that influenced selection of their first and current practice
location. Data were analyzed using frequency counts and
chi-square tests. Results: There was a 44% response rate
from the 126 eligible to participate in the survey. It was
noted that 60% of applicants listed their preference
specialty as family practice; however, less than one-third of
graduates were currently working in the family practice
specialty. Similarly, applicants noted a preference to work
in rural areas, but upon graduation for their first job and
current job they tended to work in urban areas by a large
percentage. There were five different factors with
significant relationships in regard to PA practice location:
Significant others support of location, quality of life,
employment opportunities for the significant other, scope
of practice and recreation. A significant others support of
the location appeared to be most important. Conclusion:
Choice of employment at the time of application compared
to graduation was markedly different. Choice of practice
location did not appear to be a decision made by the
graduate physician assistant alone, but also in conjunction
with their significant other.
Description
Paper presented to the 4th Annual Symposium on Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects (GRASP) held at the Hughes Metropolitan Complex, Wichita State University, April 25, 2008.
Research completed at the Department of Physician Assistant, College of Health Professions