Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiles, William
dc.contributor.authorVijverberg, Chi-Ping C.
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-09T17:17:13Z
dc.date.available2017-04-09T17:17:13Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-23
dc.identifier.citationMiles, W. and Vijverberg, C.-P. C. (2016), Did the Euro Common Currency Increase or Decrease Business Cycle Synchronization for its Member Countries?. Economica. doi:10.1111/ecca.12201en_US
dc.identifier.issn1468-0335
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12201
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/12919
dc.descriptionPost-print of this article will be available on SOAR in June 2018 after two year embargo.en_US
dc.description.abstractWe use two variants of Markov switching models to assess changes in output synchronization since the creation of the euro. Out of eight eurozone countries investigated, only one—the Netherlands—has synchronization increased since euro adoption, supporting the ‘endogenous optimal currency area’ argument of Frankel and Rose. However, in three other cases, business cycle synchronization actually fell since the euro's creation. Thus the ‘endogeneity’ of the optimal currency area criteria can go both ways—adopting a common currency may increase synchronization for nations ready for a common currency, but it can lower synchronization for nations that are far from synchronized before monetary unification.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEconomica;v., issue
dc.subjectEuro synchronizationen_US
dc.subjectEurozone countriesen_US
dc.subjectMarkov modelsen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::SOCIAL SCIENCES::Business and economics::Economicsen_US
dc.titleDid the Euro common currency Increase or decrease business cycle synchronization for its member countries?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2016 The London School of Economics and Political Scienceen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record