Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkkari, Nadine
dc.contributor.authorJornet, Josep Miquel
dc.contributor.authorWang, Pu
dc.contributor.authorFadel, Etimad
dc.contributor.authorElrefaei, Lamiaa A.
dc.contributor.authorMalik, Muhammad Ghulam Abbas
dc.contributor.authorAlmasri, Suleiman
dc.contributor.authorAkyildiz, Ian F.
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-07T23:45:58Z
dc.date.available2016-08-07T23:45:58Z
dc.date.issued2016-05
dc.identifier.citationAkkari, Nadine; Jornet, Josep Miquel; Wang, Pu; Fadel, Etimad; Elrefaei, Lamiaa A.; Malik, M. G. Abbas; Almasri, Suleiman; Akyildiz, Ian F. 2016. Joint physical and link layer error control analysis for nanonetworks in the Terahertz band. Wireless Networks, May 2016, vol. 22:no. 4:pp 1221–1233en_US
dc.identifier.issn1022-0038
dc.identifier.otherWOS:000379511700010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/12319
dc.descriptionClick on the DOI link to access the article (may not be free).en_US
dc.description.abstractNanonetworks consist of nano-sized communicating devices which are able to perform simple tasks at the nanoscale. The limited capabilities of individual nanomachines and the Terahertz (THz) band channel behavior lead to error-prone wireless links. In this paper, a cross-layer analysis of error-control strategies for nanonetworks in the THz band is presented. A mathematical framework is developed and used to analyze the tradeoffs between Bit Error Rate, Packet Error Rate, energy consumption and latency, for five different error-control strategies, namely, Automatic Repeat reQuest (ARQ), Forward Error Correction (FEC), two types of Error Prevention Codes (EPC) and a hybrid EPC. The cross-layer effects between the physical and the link layers as well as the impact of the nanomachine capabilities in both layers are taken into account. At the physical layer, nanomachines are considered to communicate by following a time-spread on-off keying modulation based on the transmission of femtosecond-long pulses. At the link layer, nanomachines are considered to access the channel in an uncoordinated fashion, by leveraging the possibility to interleave pulse-based transmissions from different nodes. Throughout the analysis, accurate path loss, noise and multi-user interference models, validated by means of electromagnetic simulation, are utilized. In addition, the energy consumption and latency introduced by a hardware implementation of each error control technique, as well as, the additional constraints imposed by the use of energy-harvesting mechanisms to power the nanomachines, are taken into account. The results show that, despite their simplicity, EPCs outperform traditional ARQ and FEC schemes, in terms of error correcting capabilities, which results in further energy savings and reduced latency.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH)-King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology- the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia- award number 12-NAN230-03. The authors also acknowledge with thanks the Science and Technology Unit, King Abdulaziz University for technical support.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer International Publishing AGen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWireless Networks;v.22:no.4
dc.subjectNanonetworksen_US
dc.subjectTerahertz banden_US
dc.subjectError controlen_US
dc.subjectPulse-based communicationen_US
dc.titleJoint physical and link layer error control analysis for nanonetworks in the Terahertz banden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New Yorken_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record