Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChaparro, Barbara S.
dc.contributor.authorShaikh, A. Dawn
dc.contributor.authorChaparro, Alex
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-10T20:38:05Z
dc.date.available2016-02-10T20:38:05Z
dc.date.issued2006-09
dc.identifier.citationChaparro, B.S., Shaikh, A.D., & Chaparro, A. (2006). The legibility of ClearType fonts. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 50(17), 1829-1832.
dc.identifier.otherdoi: 10.1177/154193120605001724
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/fzxg4j
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/11793
dc.descriptionClick on the DOI link below to access the article (may not be free).
dc.description.abstractThis article introduces six new ClearType fonts developed by Microsoft. Legibility of two of the serif fonts, Cambria and Constantia, is compared to the traditional serif font Times New Roman. Results show that the legibility, as measured by the number of correct identifications of briefly presented characters, was highest for the new font Cambria, followed by Constantia, and then Times New Roman. Old style digits, such as 0,1, and 2, used in Constantia resulted in confusion with the letters o, l, and z. Times New Roman symbols were confused with both letters and other symbols.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
dc.relation.ispartofseries51 (17)
dc.titleThe legibility of ClearType fonts
dc.typeConference paper
dc.rights.holderHuman Factors and Ergonomics Society, Inc.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record