Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKantas, Alperen Burak
dc.contributor.authorCobuloglu, Halil I.
dc.contributor.authorBueyuektahtakin, I. Esra
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-21T15:24:21Z
dc.date.available2015-05-21T15:24:21Z
dc.date.issued2015-05-01
dc.identifier.citationKantas, Alperen Burak; Cobuloglu, Halil I.; Bueyuektahtakin, I. Esra. 2015. Multi-source capacitated lot-sizing for economically viable and clean biofuel production. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 94, 1 May 2015:pp 116–129en_US
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526
dc.identifier.otherWOS:000353741400012
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/11277
dc.descriptionClick on the DOI link to access the article (may not be free).en_US
dc.description.abstractExcessive water usage and CO2 emissions resulting from industrial systems and processes have significantly raised environmental concerns. Although biofuels help to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions, the biofuel industry itself consumes a considerable amount of water and produces CO2 emissions during ethanol production. In this paper, we develop a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) capacitated lot-sizing model for analyzing the economic and environmental feasibility of ethanol production using multiple biomass sources. The model minimizes the cost of ethanol production while penalizing its possible adverse environmental impacts such as CO2 emissions and excessive water usage. The overall cost of ethanol production includes production, setup, and inventory holding costs with penalties for environmental impacts minus the income from ethanol tax credits and electricity generated from waste heat. We perform a sensitivity analysis and analyze results to improve our understanding of the economic viability of ethanol production and associated environmental effects. Results show that switchgrass is the most profitable and preferred biomass type when there is an unlimited supply of all biomass sources, while wheat and corn become more preferable in the case of a limited biomass supply. Compared to low- and medium-demand cases, when there is high demand, total costs increase significantly due to multiple production setup costs, excessive water usage, and CO2 emissions under limited biomass supply. The solution of the proposed model also indicates that if ongoing technology investments in the conversion rate succeed, the total cost of ethanol production can decrease by up to 21 percent. Finally, results show that the proposed MILP model provides valuable insights and strategies for future investors, decision-makers, and the government to achieve sustainable and economically viable biofuel production using various biomass types.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation under grant no. EPS-0903806 and the state of Kansas through the Kansas Board of Regents.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Cleaner Production;v.94
dc.subjectBiofuelen_US
dc.subjectCO2 emissionsen_US
dc.subjectWater usageen_US
dc.subjectProduction planningen_US
dc.subjectMixed-integer optimizationen_US
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_US
dc.titleMulti-source capacitated lot-sizing for economically viable and clean biofuel productionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • ISME Research Publications
    Research works published by faculty and students of the Department of Industrial, Systems, and Manufacturing Engineering

Show simple item record