Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEsmaeili, Mohammad Amin
dc.contributor.authorTwomey, Janet M.
dc.contributor.authorOvercash, Michael
dc.contributor.authorSoltani, Seyed A.
dc.contributor.authorMcGuire, Charles
dc.contributor.authorAli, Kamran
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-07T19:41:48Z
dc.date.available2015-05-07T19:41:48Z
dc.date.issued2015-04
dc.identifier.citationEsmaeili, Mohammad Amin; Twomey, Janet M.; Overcash, Michael; Soltani, Seyed A.; McGuire, Charles; Ali, Kamran. 2015. Scope for energy improvement for hospital imaging services in the USA. J Health Serv Res Policy, April 2015:vol. 20:no. 2:pp 67-73en_US
dc.identifier.issn1355-8196
dc.identifier.otherWOS:000352552500002
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1355819614554845
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/11268
dc.descriptionClick on the DOI link to access the article (may not be free).en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective To aid radiologists by measuring the carbon footprint of CT scans by quantifying in-hospital and out-of-hospital energy use and to assess public health impacts. Method The study followed a standard life cycle assessment protocol to measure energy from a CT scan then expanding to all hospital electrical energy related to CT usage. In addition, all the fuel energy used to generate electricity and to manufacture the CT consumables was measured. The study was conducted at two hospitals. Results The entire life cycle energy for a CT scan was 24-34kWh of natural resource energy per scan. The actual active patient scan energy that produces the images is only about 1.6% of this total life cycle energy. This large multiplier to get total CT energy is a previously undocumented environmental response to the direct radiology order for a patient CT scan. The CT in-hospital energy related to idle periods, where the machine is on but no patients are being scanned and is 14-30-fold higher than the energy used for the CT image. The in-hospital electrical energy of a CT scan makes up only about 25% of the total energy footprint. The rest is generated outside the hospital: 54-62% for generation and transmission of the electricity, while 13-22% is for all the energy to make the consumables. Different CT scanners have some influences on the results and could help guide purchase of CT equipment.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNSF CMMI 0946342 grant. The support of the Bloomfield Foundation Industrial Sustainability Initiative at Wichita State University (www.wichita.edu/sustainability) has been vital to this research.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Health Services Research & Policy;v.20:no.2
dc.subjectCT scansen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental sustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.titleScope for energy improvement for hospital imaging services in the USAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2015 by SAGE Publications


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record