Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTribby, Aaron C.
dc.contributor.authorPatterson, Kaitlyn M.
dc.contributor.authorStover, Caitlin D.
dc.contributor.authorLajza, David G.
dc.contributor.authorGeddam, David A.R.
dc.contributor.authorAbe, Takashi
dc.contributor.authorDalbo, Vincent J.
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Kaelin C.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-10T18:08:39Z
dc.date.available2014-11-10T18:08:39Z
dc.date.issued2014-05
dc.identifier.citationTribby, Aaron C.; Patterson, Kaitlyn M.; Stover, Caitlin D.; Lajza, David G.; Geddam, David A. R.; Abe, Takashi; Dalbo, Vincent J.; Young, Kaelin C. 2014. Protein intake and bone mineral density in active older adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 46:no. 5:pp 40-40:Supplement: 1 Meeting Abstract: 198en_US
dc.identifier.issn0195-9131
dc.identifier.otherWOS:000339115900087
dc.identifier.urihttp://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/toc/2014/05001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/10894
dc.descriptionClick on the link to access this abstract at the publisher's website.en_US
dc.description.abstractRecently, there has been a renewed interest in the relationship between protein intake and bone health. Several cross-sectional studies have reported a positive influence of protein intake on bone mineral density (BMD). However, few studies have focused on protein consumption with regards to protein quality (essential amino acids/total amino acids) and distribution throughout a day. PURPOSE: To determine the association between consumption of total protein, quality protein, and quality protein distribution and bone mineral density in active older adults. METHODS: Thirty-three healthy male (n=11) and female (n=22) active older adults (60.1 ± 7.1 years, 168.1 ± 8.4cm, 68.4 ± 12.5kg) participated in this cross sectional study. Total protein, quality protein, and daily quality protein distribution were determined from a seven-day food record. Seven-day food records and amino acid profiling were analyzed using a computer software program (Nutribase, v.11, Cybersoft Inc., Phoenix, AZ). Daily food records were averaged across seven-days to give an average representation of total protein intake, quality protein intake, and quality protein distribution. Specifically, quality protein distribution was defined as consumption of a meal offering at least 10 grams of essential amino acids. Areal BMD (g/cm2 ) of the non-dominant proximal femur (total hip and femoral neck) and lumbar spine (L1-L4) were determined by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (Discovery A, Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA). Self-reported physical activity level of the participants was determined using the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using Pearson Partial Correlation Coefficients controlling for body mass and physical activity level with an alpha level of 0.05. RESULTS: Neither average 24 hour total protein intake (89.9 ± 28.7g), quality protein intake (0.67 ± 0.06g), or quality protein distribution throughout a day (1.02 ± 0.6g) was significantly (p > 0.05) associated with aBMD at any bone site. CONCLUSION: In contrast to other cross-sectional studies, our findings suggest that, after controlling for physical activity level and body weight, total protein intake, quality protein intake, and quality protein distribution is not associated with aBMD in active older adults.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise;v.46:no.5
dc.titleProtein intake and bone mineral density in active older adultsen_US
dc.typeAbstracten_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2014, (C) 2014 American College of Sports Medicine


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record