dc.contributor.author | Epps, Elizabeth J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Staab, Carina A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Patterson, Jeremy A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-09-26T19:53:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-09-26T19:53:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Epps, Elizabeth J.; Staab, Carina A.; Patterson, Jeremy A. 2013. Acute effects of five-toed shoes on postural SWAY. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 45:no. 5:pp 677-677:Supplement: 1 Meeting Abstract: 2852 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0195-9131 | |
dc.identifier.other | WOS:000330469705214 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10057/10752 | |
dc.description.abstract | The latest trend in athletic footwear is the five-toed running shoes. There are claims that the five-toed shoes will help develop strength and mechanical efficiency.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if an acute difference exists in postural sway between three different conditions; barefoot (BF), five-toed shoes (FT), and traditional
running shoes (RS) without previous experience wearing five-toed shoes.
METHODS: 49 healthy individuals (18 male, 31 female; avg. age = 23.12±2.63) performed a bilateral, tandem, and single leg balance tests with each of the three conditions (BF, FT, RS).
All balance assessments were 10-second measures with eyes closed. A commercially available Smartphone with an application that accesses accelerometer outputs was used to determine
postural sway. One trial was completed for each condition with a 4-minute rest between trials.
RESULTS: No differences were observed between barefoot and five-toed shoes (p=0.576), barefoot and athletic shoes (p=0.521), or five-toed shoes and athletic shoes (p=0.901).
CONCLUSIONS: For individuals with no previous experience wearing five-toed shoes there is no change in postural sway when compared to being barefoot or wearing traditional athletic
shoes. This study assessed balance in individuals wearing five-toed shoes for the first time; further research should be conducted on balance and other parameters after a period of training with
this type of footwear to assess the claims of improved mechanical efficiency. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The latest trend in athletic footwear is the five-toed running shoes. There are claims that the five-toed shoes will help develop strength and mechanical efficiency.Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine if an acute difference exists in postural sway between three different conditions; barefoot (BF), five-toed shoes (FT), and traditional running shoes (RS) without previous experience wearing five-toed shoes.METHODS: 49 healthy individuals (18 male, 31 female; avg. age = 23.12±2.63) performed a bilateral, tandem, and single leg balance tests with each of the three conditions (BF, FT, RS). All balance assessments were 10-second measures with eyes closed. A commercially available Smartphone with an application that accesses accelerometer outputs was used to determine postural sway. One trial was completed for each condition with a 4-minute rest between trials.RESULTS: No differences were observed between barefoot and five-toed shoes (p=0.576), barefoot and athletic shoes (p=0.521), or five-toed shoes and athletic shoes (p=0.901).CONCLUSIONS: For individuals with no previous experience wearing five-toed shoes there is no change in postural sway when compared to being barefoot or wearing traditional athletic shoes. This study assessed balance in individuals wearing five-toed shoes for the first time; further research should be conducted on balance and other parameters after a period of training with this type of footwear to assess the claims of improved mechanical efficiency. | |
dc.description.uri | Click on the link to access this abstract at the publisher's website. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise;v.45:no.5 | |
dc.title | Acute effects of five-toed shoes on postural SWAY | en_US |
dc.type | Abstract | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright © 2013, (C) 2013 American College of Sports Medicine | |