Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMiles, William
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-17T17:27:03Z
dc.date.available2014-06-17T17:27:03Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationMiles, William. 2014. The housing bubble: how much blame does the fed really deserve? Journal of Real Estate Research, vol. 36:no. 1:ppg. 41-58.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0896-5803
dc.identifier.otherWOS:000333231100002
dc.identifier.urihttp://ideas.repec.org/a/jre/issued/v36n12014p41-58.html
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/10598
dc.descriptionClick on the link to access the article (may not be free).en_US
dc.description.abstractTwo recent empirical papers have blamed the Fed for the latest boom and bust in housing. Neither study includes long-term interest rates, which are more affected by global factors than the federal funds rate (FFR). In this paper, I include both the mortgage rate and the FFR as determinants of housing variables. The results indicate the long-term rate has independent and sometimes greater predictive power for housing than the FFR, especially in recent years. Finally, I demonstrate that the mortgage rate does not simply proxy for monetary policy-the impact of the FFR on long-term rates has also fallen over time.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Real Estate Societyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Real Estate Research;v.36:no.1
dc.titleThe housing bubble: how much blame does the fed really deserve?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record