Ways of knowing and willingness to argue
Schommer-Aikins, Marlene Easter, Marilyn
Schommer-Aikins, Marlene
Easter, Marilyn
Citations
Altmetric:
Location
Time Period
Advisors
Original Date
Digitization Date
Issue Date
2009-03
Type
Article
Genre
Keywords
Multicenter Study
Subjects (LCSH)
Citation
The Journal of psychology. 2009 Mar; 143(2): 117-32.
Abstract
Willingness to argue is associated with higher level thinking. The authors tested the relation between ways of knowing-involving separate knowing (i.e., playing the devil's advocate) and connected knowing (i.e., empathic understanding)--and students' willingness to argue. Participants were 171 male and 231 female college undergraduates who completed assessments in ways of knowing and willingness to argue. Also, the participants defined the word argument in their own words. After the authors controlled for demographic variables, endorsement of separate knowing predicted willingness to argue. Students with high scores in separate knowing (objective, adversarial knowing) and connected knowing (subjective, empathic knowing) indicated more willingness to argue. Furthermore, these same students defined argument as a constructive form of communication. Students with low scores in separate knowing defined argument as an emotional battle with the goal of psychological harm. This negative perspective could be an impediment to engaging students in classroom debate and critical thinking.
Table of Contents
Description
Click on the DOI link below to access the article (may not be free).
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Journal
Journal of Psychology
Book Title
Series
Digital Collection
Finding Aid URL
Use and Reproduction
Archival Collection
NLM
PubMed ID
DOI
ISSN
0022-3980