To rotate or not to rotate – How does job rotation impact musculoskeletal disorder risk?
Jorgensen, Michael J. Davis, Kermit Gallagher, Sean Kotowski, Susan Ahire, Aditya Taheri, Mostafa Nguyen, Hai Rungere, Dickson Dondi, Amour Bellacov, Ryan
Jorgensen, Michael J.
Davis, Kermit
Gallagher, Sean
Kotowski, Susan
Ahire, Aditya
Taheri, Mostafa
Nguyen, Hai
Rungere, Dickson
Dondi, Amour
Bellacov, Ryan
Other Names
Location
Time Period
Advisors
Original Date
Digitization Date
Issue Date
2025
Type
Book chapter
Genre
Keywords
Ergonomics,Job rotation,Musculoskeletal disorders,Risk assessment methods
Subjects (LCSH)
Citation
Jorgensen, M., Davis, K., Gallagher, S., Kotowski, S., Ahire, A., Taheri, M., Nguyen, H., Rungere, D., Dondi, A., Bellacov, R., Omoifo-irefo, M. (2025). To Rotate or Not to Rotate – How Does Job Rotation Impact Musculoskeletal Disorder Risk?. In: Tareq Ahram, Waldemar Karwowski and Jay Kalra (eds) Human Factors in Design, Engineering, and Computing. AHFE (2025) International Conference. AHFE Open Access, vol 199. AHFE International, USA.http://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1007051
Abstract
To address work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs; e.g., carpal tunnel syndrome), some companies utilize job rotation, systematically rotating workers through different jobs within a workday. Prior research suggests that while job rotation may decrease WMSD risk for some workers, other workers may see their risk increase. There is a lack of evidence from actual worksites that utilize job rotation on the impact on WMSD risk for all workers involved in job rotation. The objective was to compare WMSD risk for job rotation schemes to jobs not involved in job rotation. Workers from U.S. manufacturing companies involved in rotation schemes with four jobs (N = 42) that rotate within a workday were evaluated for WMSD risk factors for the hand/wrist, shoulder and low back at each job. WMSD risk was determined for each worker and each rotation scheme utilizing validated fatigue failure tools (DUET for hand/wrist, LiFFT for low back, The Shoulder Tool (TST) for shoulders) and estimated WMSD risk for each job in the rotation scheme assuming the job was performed for the whole workday (not involved in rotation). Job rotation resulted in increases in DUET risk probabilities of approximately 10% compared to not rotating for the right (p<0.0002) and left (p<0.0002) hand/wrist, and an approximate 6% increase in LiFFT and TST risk probabilities compared to not rotating (LiFFT: p<0.0002; right shoulder: p = 0.0004; left shoulder: p = 0.0028). Job rotation also resulted in 3 or 4 of the jobs in rotation schemes increasing in risk for 67% of the schemes for DUET, 43% of the schemes for LiFFT, and approximately 50% of the schemes for TST. The results demonstrated job rotation resulted in modest (6% to 10%) but significant increases in WMSD risk across multiple body regions compared to working in jobs that don’t rotate. Additionally, rotating workers through four-job rotation schemes resulted in the majority of jobs in these schemes increasing upper extremity risk compared to not rotating. The decision to rotate or not may in part depend on the WMSD risk levels for jobs being considered for inclusion in the rotation schemes. Inclusion of jobs that have elevated risk (e.g., moderate or high risk) may decrease the risk for those workers who otherwise would work the full workday in those jobs, but will likely increase the risk to workers in jobs that have lower risk. © 2025. Published by AHFE Open Access. All rights reserved.
Table of Contents
Description
Click on the DOI link to access this article at the publishers website (may not be free).
Publisher
AHFE International
Journal
Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics International
Book Title
Series
Digital Collection
Finding Aid URL
Use and Reproduction
Archival Collection
PubMed ID
ISSN
27710718