<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace collection: PSY Graduate Student Conference Papers</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10057/461</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1404" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1393" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1387" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1377" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  <textInput>
    <title>The collection's search engine</title>
    <description>Search the Channel</description>
    <name>s</name>
    <link>http://soar.wichita.edu:8080/dspace/simple-search</link>
  </textInput>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1404">
    <title>Wichita youth empowerment partnership: a community assessment of District 1</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1404</link>
    <description>title: Wichita youth empowerment partnership: a community assessment of District 1 authors: Elias Rodas, Dina M.; Wituk, Scott; Meissen, Gregory J.; Thomas, Maaskelah; Gregory, Tara; Goines, Paulette
&lt;br&gt;abstract: District 1 of Wichita, Kansas is primarily&#xD;
formed by African American population and faces&#xD;
multiple economic and social challenges that require&#xD;
greater collaboration and improved capacity of local&#xD;
faith-based (FBO) and community-based organizations&#xD;
(CBO). The Wichita Youth Empowerment Partnership&#xD;
(WYEP) is an initiative facilitated by the Center for&#xD;
Community Support &amp; Research (CCSR) and includes&#xD;
10 partnering faith-based and community-based&#xD;
organizations (FBCBOs) that address youth violence and&#xD;
gang activity in the mentioned district. A participatory&#xD;
community assessment was conducted to obtain&#xD;
information and establish future directions for services&#xD;
and activities of the organizations, from the youth’s&#xD;
perspective. Community assessment was a participatory&#xD;
process that integrated mixed methods to collect&#xD;
information: youth survey, focus groups, photovoice, and&#xD;
archival data. Information obtained was quantitatively&#xD;
and qualitatively analyzed. Adult collaboration and&#xD;
inclusion of a youth research team were central aspects.
&lt;br&gt;description: Paper presented to the 4th Annual Symposium on Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects (GRASP) held at the Hughes Metropolitan Complex, Wichita State University, April 25, 2008.
&lt;br&gt;</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1393">
    <title>Teacher training for Head Start classrooms</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1393</link>
    <description>title: Teacher training for Head Start classrooms authors: Moreno, Desirae A.; Just, Christy L.; Snyder, James
&lt;br&gt;abstract: The goal of this study was to provide Head Start teachers with specific skills in developing positive relationships&#xD;
with students and in more effectively managing problematic child behavior in the classroom. The hypothesis was that&#xD;
teacher behavior management training (BMT) would reduce child problem behavior and create a more supportive social&#xD;
environment in Head Start classrooms compared to standard teacher practices, or treatment as usual (TAU). Ten teachers&#xD;
serving twenty classrooms in three centers received six hours of specialized training in addition to training as usual, while&#xD;
seven teachers serving fourteen classrooms in two centers received training as usual. Training as usual consisted of standard&#xD;
teacher training provided by Head Start. BMT entailed the addition of 6 hours of group teacher training grounded in “The&#xD;
Incredible Years: Promoting Positive Academic and Social Behaviors” approach, and individualized in-class mentoring.&#xD;
Repeated measures ANOVAs (group X time) were used to assess group differences in change in children’s behavior from&#xD;
fall to spring of the school year. There was a significant group X time interaction (p = .013) in observed rates of child&#xD;
disruptive and aggressive behavior which increased over time in the TAU group and decreased in BMT group.
&lt;br&gt;description: Paper presented to the 4th Annual Symposium on Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects (GRASP) held at the Hughes Metropolitan Complex, Wichita State University, April 25, 2008.
&lt;br&gt;</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1387">
    <title>The great between-subjects assumption</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1387</link>
    <description>title: The great between-subjects assumption authors: Lambdin, Charles; Shaffer, Victoria A.
&lt;br&gt;abstract: There seems to be an assumption that some judgment and decision-making (JDM) findings will only be supported in&#xD;
between-subjects designs, even though between-subjects results can be misleading. This paper tested this assumption by&#xD;
taking two famous between-subjects JDM findings (Shafir, 1993; Tversky &amp; Kahneman, 1986) and replicating them within&#xD;
subjects. Replicating within subjects allowed us to conduct a manipulation check, and the qualitative data gathered&#xD;
surprisingly suggest the original experiments lack construct validity
&lt;br&gt;description: Paper presented to the 4th Annual Symposium on Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects (GRASP) held at the Hughes Metropolitan Complex, Wichita State University, April 25, 2008.
&lt;br&gt;</description>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1377">
    <title>Sexual satisfaction and commitment</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10057/1377</link>
    <description>title: Sexual satisfaction and commitment authors: Pearson, Rachel
&lt;br&gt;abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the mechanisms by which commitment is associated with&#xD;
sexual satisfaction. This study expanded on previous research to determine whether three pro-relationship sexual&#xD;
behaviors (disclosure, motivation to satisfy partner, and emotional bond) would explain a significant amount of&#xD;
variance in participants’ sexual satisfaction and whether these variables mediated the association between&#xD;
commitment and sexual satisfaction.&#xD;
A convenience sample was collected, consisting of 100 undergraduate female students. Participants completed a&#xD;
survey that included the following measures: Rusbult relationship satisfaction scale, The Global Measure of Sexual&#xD;
Satisfaction, Rusbult’s commitment scale, and scales created by the researcher to assess the three pro-relationship&#xD;
sexual behaviors.&#xD;
There was a statistically significant correlation between sexual satisfaction and relationship satisfaction (r=.70)&#xD;
and between sexual satisfaction and commitment (r=.57). Commitment was most highly correlated with emotional&#xD;
bond (r (100)=.70), followed by motivation to satisfy partner (r (100)=.47), and disclosure (r (100)=.36). These results&#xD;
indicate that women who reported being more committed in their relationship also reported an increased use of the&#xD;
three pro-relationship sexual behaviors.&#xD;
Commitment predicted a significant amount of sexual satisfaction variance (r²=.34). When sexual satisfaction was&#xD;
regressed on total pro-relationship sexual behaviors score, 44% of the variance in sexual satisfaction was accounted for.&#xD;
When commitment was added, only an additional 4% of variance was accounted for. Thus, the relationship between&#xD;
commitment and sexual satisfaction is almost completely mediated by the three pro-relationship sexual behavior scales.&#xD;
Overall the model accounted for 48% of the variance in sexual satisfaction. This research is important in treatment of&#xD;
sexual difficulties. Commitment is important to sexual satisfaction; the three pro-relationship sexual behaviors are&#xD;
especially important for sexual functioning.
&lt;br&gt;description: Paper presented to the 4th Annual Symposium on Graduate Research and Scholarly Projects (GRASP) held at the Hughes Metropolitan Complex, Wichita State University, April 25, 2008.
&lt;br&gt;</description>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

