Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMoore-Jansen, Peer H.
dc.contributor.authorAbles, Michael Jason
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-15T18:43:08Z
dc.date.available2012-11-15T18:43:08Z
dc.date.copyright2012en
dc.date.issued2012-05
dc.identifier.othert12001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/5370
dc.descriptionThesis (M.A.)--Wichita State University, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Program of Liberal Studiesen_US
dc.description.abstractThe National Museum of American Indians Act of 1989 (NMAI) and the Native American Grave Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA) are two viable pieces of legislation that give tribal communities an opportunity to reclaim objects of ancestral heritage. However, the repatriation process uses academic and governmental mandates that support the colonialist perspective. The case study of the Logan Museum of Anthropology is one particular example of the conflicts and misconceptions about repatriation. This case study specifically focuses on the Potawatomi Nation and their interaction with present day NAGPRA legislation. The case study of the Logan Museum of Anthropology raises questions about ownership and the types of evidence used to support a repatriation claim. The role of academia in the context of the NMAI Act and NAGPRA is focused through a variety of disciplinary fields such as anthropology, history, and art history. With the current amendment to NAGPRA, “the CUHR ruling,” the process of repatriation is further convoluted. However, tribal nations are exploring methods of repatriation that entail collaborating with other tribal communities for a common goal. However, because these two pieces of legislation are unclear and lead to personal interpretation, the federal legislation must continue to amend and / or create new legislation to adjust the current mandates.en_US
dc.format.extentviii, 80 p.en
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWichita State Universityen_US
dc.rightsCopyright Michael Jason Ables, 2012. All rights reserveden
dc.subject.lcshElectronic dissertationsen
dc.titleConflicts and misconceptions of the repatriation processen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • LAS Theses and Dissertations [440]
    Theses and dissertations completed at the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Fall 2005 -)
  • MALS Theses [17]
  • Master's Theses [973]
    This collection includes Master's theses completed at the Wichita State University Graduate School (Fall 2005 --)

Show simple item record