Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLorenz, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorReiman, Michael P.
dc.contributor.authorWalker, John C.
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-08T18:52:38Z
dc.date.available2012-11-08T18:52:38Z
dc.date.issued2010-11
dc.identifier.citationLorenz, Daniel; Reiman, Michael P.; Walker, John C. 2010. Periodization. Sports Health, v.2 no.6 pp.509-518en_US
dc.identifier.otherPMCID: PMC3438871
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738110375910
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/5349
dc.descriptionClick on the DOI link to access the article (may not be free).en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Clinicians are constantly faced with the challenge of designing training programs for injured and noninjured athletes that maximize healing and optimize performance. Periodization is a concept of systematic progression—that is, resistance training programs that follow predictable patterns of change in training variables. The strength training literature is abundant with studies comparing periodization schemes on uninjured, trained, and untrained athletes. The rehabilitation literature, however, is scarce with information about how to optimally design resistance training programs based on periodization principles for injured athletes. The purpose of this review is to discuss relevant training variables and methods of periodization, as well as periodization program outcomes. A secondary purpose is to provide an anecdotal framework regarding implementation of periodization principles into rehabilitation programs. Evidence Acquisition: A Medline search from 1979 to 2009 was implemented with the keywords periodization, strength training, rehabilitation, endurance, power, hypertrophy, and resistance training with the Boolean term AND in all possible combinations in the English language. Each author also undertook independent hand searching of article references used in this review. Results: Based on the studies researched, periodized strength training regimens demonstrate improved outcomes as compared to nonperiodized programs. Conclusions: Despite the evidence in the strength training literature supporting periodization programs, there is a considerable lack of data in the rehabilitation literature about program design and successful implementation of periodization into rehabilitation programs.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSports Health;v.2 no.6
dc.subjectPeriodizationen_US
dc.subjectUndulating periodizationen_US
dc.subjectNonlinear periodizationen_US
dc.subjectLinear periodizationen_US
dc.titlePeriodization: current review and suggested implementation for athletic rehabilitationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2010 Daniel S. Lorenz, Michael P. Reiman, and John C. Walker


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record