text

Periodization: current review and suggested implementation for athletic rehabilitation

SOAR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lorenz, Daniel
dc.contributor.author Reiman, Michael P.
dc.contributor.author Walker, John C.
dc.date.accessioned 2012-11-08T18:52:38Z
dc.date.available 2012-11-08T18:52:38Z
dc.date.issued 2010-11
dc.identifier.citation Lorenz, Daniel; Reiman, Michael P.; Walker, John C. 2010. Periodization. Sports Health, v.2 no.6 pp.509-518 en_US
dc.identifier.other PMCID: PMC3438871
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738110375910
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10057/5349
dc.description Click on the DOI link to access the article (may not be free). en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: Clinicians are constantly faced with the challenge of designing training programs for injured and noninjured athletes that maximize healing and optimize performance. Periodization is a concept of systematic progression—that is, resistance training programs that follow predictable patterns of change in training variables. The strength training literature is abundant with studies comparing periodization schemes on uninjured, trained, and untrained athletes. The rehabilitation literature, however, is scarce with information about how to optimally design resistance training programs based on periodization principles for injured athletes. The purpose of this review is to discuss relevant training variables and methods of periodization, as well as periodization program outcomes. A secondary purpose is to provide an anecdotal framework regarding implementation of periodization principles into rehabilitation programs. Evidence Acquisition: A Medline search from 1979 to 2009 was implemented with the keywords periodization, strength training, rehabilitation, endurance, power, hypertrophy, and resistance training with the Boolean term AND in all possible combinations in the English language. Each author also undertook independent hand searching of article references used in this review. Results: Based on the studies researched, periodized strength training regimens demonstrate improved outcomes as compared to nonperiodized programs. Conclusions: Despite the evidence in the strength training literature supporting periodization programs, there is a considerable lack of data in the rehabilitation literature about program design and successful implementation of periodization into rehabilitation programs. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Sports Health;v.2 no.6
dc.subject Periodization en_US
dc.subject Undulating periodization en_US
dc.subject Nonlinear periodization en_US
dc.subject Linear periodization en_US
dc.title Periodization: current review and suggested implementation for athletic rehabilitation en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.rights.holder Copyright © 2010 Daniel S. Lorenz, Michael P. Reiman, and John C. Walker

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search SOAR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics