text

Closed kinetic chain (linear) isokinetic testing: Relationships to functional testing

SOAR Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Manske, Robert C.
dc.contributor.author Smith, Barbara S.
dc.contributor.author Rogers, Michael E.
dc.contributor.author Wyatt, Frank B.
dc.date.accessioned 2011-08-24T16:24:03Z
dc.date.available 2011-08-24T16:24:03Z
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.identifier.citation Manske, Robert C., Smith, Barbara S., Rogers, Michael E. and Frank B. Wyatt. 2003. Closed kinetic chain (linear) isokinetic testing: Relationships to functional testing. Isokinetics and exercise science, Vol.11, No.3.pp.171-179 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0959-3020
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10057/3684
dc.description.abstract Study design: A correlation study to determine the relationship of the results of linear isokinetic testing and various functional tests. Objectives: To determine the relationship of scores on a linear isokinetic test to scores on a variety of lower extremity functional tests. Background: Both isokinetic testing and functional tests are commonly used during the rehabilitation of individuals with sports and orthopedic injuries. Limited information exists regarding the relationships of scores on a linear isokinetic test and scores on functional tests. Methods and measures: Twenty-nine healthy subjects performed a velocity spectrum linear isokinetic test consisting of 3 sets in a bilateral reciprocal mode, followed by three sets in a bilateral coupled mode. Testing velocities were 25.4, 50.8 and 76.2 cm per second. Six maximal volitional linear isokinetic repetitions were performed at each testing velocity. Following linear isokinetic testing, subjects performed 5 functional tests: bilateral leg vertical jump, unilateral leg vertical jump, double leg jump for distance, single-leg hop for distance, and single-leg timed 6-meter hop. Functional testing entailed 3 maximal volitional attempts of the 5 procedures for both the dominant and non-dominant lower extremity. The mean of the 3 attempts was used for calculations.Means and standard deviations of the functional test scores and isokinetic test scores were determined using standard statistical procedures. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients were used to determine the relationship between the mean scores on the linear isokinetic test scores and functional tests for both the dominant and non-dominant limbs. Results: Twenty-three out of 36 correlation coefficients were significant at the p < 0.01 level, whi1e 12 out of 36 were significant at the p < 0.05 level. Only 1 out of 36 was non-significant when comparing bilateral reciprocal scores to single-leg functional test scores. The bilateral reciprocal correlation coefficients ranged from −0.36 to 0.65. Six out of 12 bilateral coupled correlation coefficients were significant at p < 0.01, while 3 out of 12 were significant at the p < 0.05 level and only 3 were considered non-significant. The bilateral coupled correlation coefficients ranged from 0.11 to 0.64. Conclusions: Results from this study indicate a significant relationship exists between the results of linear isokinetic testing and various functional tests. Despite the significant relationship, the majority of Pearson Product moment correlation coefficients were in the low to moderate range. Therefore, the use of either a linear isokinetic test or a functional test in isolation to determine strength and performance is strongly discouraged. Linear isokinetic testing should be used for testing lower extremity strength,while functional tests should be used to determine performance levels. The authors recommend utilizing both testing methods since strength does not always correlate strongly with physical performance. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher IOS Press en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries Isokinetics and exercise science;Vol.11,No.3
dc.subject Muscular strength en_US
dc.subject Performance tests en_US
dc.subject Isokinetics en_US
dc.title Closed kinetic chain (linear) isokinetic testing: Relationships to functional testing en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.description.version Peer reviewed
dc.rights.holder Copyright by IOS Press, 2003. Current policy gives copyright to authors.

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search SOAR


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics