Show simple item record

dc.contributorWichita State University. Department of Sociologyen_US
dc.contributor.authorHill, Twyla J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-29T18:05:48Z
dc.date.available2012-03-29T18:05:48Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier16541926en_US
dc.identifier0370033en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational journal of aging & human development. 2006; 62(2): 117-42.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0091-4150en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=4D638E5BE5BC83821DDDen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10057/4996
dc.descriptionThe full text of this article is not available in SOAR. WSU users can access the article via commercial databases licensed by University Libraries: http://libcat.wichita.edu/vwebv/holdingsInfo?bibId=1327687. The URL of this article is: http://ejournals.ebsco.com/direct.asp?ArticleID=4D638E5BE5BC83821DDD.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzes structural forces affecting state patterns of parental presence within grandparent-grandchild coresidence by testing demographic, social change, policy environment, and social problems models. The project combines published state-level data with the 1970, 1980, and 1990 Census Public Use Microdata Samples. While factors differentially affect the proportion of children living in each household structure, coresidence seems to be encouraged by social contexts in which people are poor, the middle generation is likely to die, and which have higher rates of births to teens. State policy environment only affects proportions of children living in three generation households for 1980 and 1990. Structural variables other than social problems matter more for percent of children living in three generation households than for proportion of children living only with grandparents. Structural variables explain more variation in proportion of children living in skipped generation households than in proportion of children living with both parents and grandparents.en_US
dc.format.extent117-42en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBaywood Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Aging & Human Developmenten_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInt J Aging Hum Deven_US
dc.sourceNLMen_US
dc.subjectResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'ten_US
dc.subject.meshDemographyen_US
dc.subject.meshFamily Characteristicsen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshIntergenerational Relationsen_US
dc.subject.meshModels, Psychologicalen_US
dc.subject.meshParentsen_US
dc.subject.meshPublic Policyen_US
dc.subject.meshSocial Changeen_US
dc.subject.meshSocial Problemsen_US
dc.subject.meshSocial Supporten_US
dc.subject.meshSocioeconomic Factorsen_US
dc.titleGrandchild, grandparent, and parent coresidence from 1970 to 1990: structural factors affecting state patternsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.coverage.spacialUnited Statesen_US
dc.description.versionpeer revieweden_US
dc.rights.holderCopyright © 2006 Baywood Publishingen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record